First, we compared demographic characteristics of participants in each COVID-19 period. Then, we examined EQ-5D-5L dimensions, index, and VAS scores pre-COVID and during waves 1 and 2 in the overall sample compared to Alberta EQ-5D-5L population norms, and by subgroups defined by age, sex, and total annual household income. Samples’ characteristics in the three COVID-19 periods were compared with those of the Alberta population norms sample (Alberta PROMs and EQ-5D, 2018). Bivariate analyses using chi-square test, t-test, or one-way ANOVA were used to test differences in HRQL between COVID-19 periods as appropriate. Minimal important difference (MID) of 0.04 for EQ-5D-5L index score (McClure et al., 2017) and 7.0 for the VAS score (Pickard et al., 2007) were used to determine an important difference. Data analysis was conducted using STATA 15.0; p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.