2.3. Characterization of Emulsion

YL Yifan Lu
BZ Bo Zhang
HS Huishan Shen
XG Xiangzhen Ge
XS Xiangxiang Sun
QZ Qian Zhang
XZ Xiuyun Zhang
ZS Zhuangzhuang Sun
WL Wenhao Li
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Emulsion morphology was observed by a digital optical microscope (DMBA400, Motic China Group Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China) at 400× magnification and took photos to record observations.

Fluorescence microscopy was carried out using an automatic fluorescence microscope (LECIA DM6 B, Lecia, Wetzlar, Germany). Nile red (1 mg) was dissolved in 1 mL of DMSO to prepare a fluorescent dye solution. The fleshly prepared emulsion and dye solution was mixed evenly and dropped on the slide, covered with a coverslip, and left to dry naturally for 2 h. The distribution of the two phases was observed using a fluorescence microscope.

The rheological property of lutein emulsion was determined using a rotational rheometer (DHR-1, Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The model chosen was flow scanning. Each measurement was carried out using parallel plates with a 40-mm gap. The temperature was set at 25 °C and 50 °C, respectively. Dynamic viscosity values were obtained at shear rates in the range of 0.01–100 s−1. The flow measurement data were evaluated by Herschel–Bulkley:

where τ is the shear stress (Pa); τ0 is the yield stress (Pa); K is the consistency coefficient (Pa·sn); γ is the shear rate (s−1); n is the flow behavior index.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A