2.9. Promoter Analysis and Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Assays

RK Raisa I. Krutilina
HP Hilaire Playa
DB Danielle L. Brooks
LS Luciana P. Schwab
DP Deanna N. Parke
DO Damilola Oluwalana
DL Douglas R. Layman
MF Meiyun Fan
DJ Daniel L. Johnson
JY Junming Yue
HS Heather Smallwood
TS Tiffany N. Seagroves
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The mouse (Ckb) and human (CKB) proximal promoters (−2000 to +500 bp) were scanned for putative functional hypoxic response elements (HREs) using the Transcription Factor Matrix (TFM) Explorer algorithm and weight matrices available from JASPER and TRANSFAC. PyMT HIF-1 WT and KO cells and MCF7 empty vector (pLKO.1-puro or EV) or shHIF1A transduced cells described in [34] were cultured at normoxia or 0.5% O2 (hypoxia) for 6–24 h and fixed with 1% formaldehyde for 12 min. Positive controls included a previously validated functional HRE in the Vegf promoter for PyMT cells [35] and a previously validated functional HRE identified in the EPO promoter [36] for MCF-7 cells. Primers were designed to putative independent HRE sites, as well as to non-HRE sequences in the promoter regions (Supplementary Table S6). DNA was sheared to 500 bp and ChIP was performed using antibodies against HIF-1α or anti-rabbit IgG control, and raw data were analyzed as in [37].

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A