Assessment of the methodology quality

SW Shinta Oktya Wardhani
JF Jonny Karunia Fajar
GS Gatot Soegiarto
LW Laksmi Wulandari
HM Helnida Anggun Maliga
MI Muhammad Ilmawan
RM Risna Merysa
AS Arlentina Bentivolia Simamora
QA Qurrata Aini
KN Komang Noviantari
AL Ayu Widya Lestari
MH Maria Yoheni Harnila
IS Imam Syafi'i
JD Jane Andrea Christiano Djianzonie
NS Nenci Siagian
SN Sri Nining
RH Risyda Zakiyah Hanim
WW Wahyuni Wahyuni
FA Fitri Aulia
JJ Juliansyah Juliansyah
RM Reflin Mahmud
FT Fredo Tamara
AM Aditya Indra Mahendra
AW Amanda Cininta Wowor
FB Fikri Baladraf
PH Ponda Hernest Hadinata
AI Adhityari Ikkeputri
HN Hana Nadya
DK Dessy Aprilia Kartini
MH Milda Husnah
FN Firzan Nainu
HH Harapan Harapan
AK Ashish Kumar
MG Mahir Gachabayov
GW Guilherme Welter Wendt
SE Seyi Samson Enitan
ask Ask a question
Favorite

All included articles were assessed for their quality using NOS for observational studies 17 and the Jada-modified scale for RCTs. 18 The article quality was interpreted as low, moderate, and high. Low quality articles were excluded from our study. The assessment was performed by two independent authors (MI, HAM), and when a discrepancy was observed an assessment by a senior researcher (JKF) was conducted.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A