The quantitative phase-field model proposed by Bragard et al.27 was used for the simulation of WS2 growth under the modification of the description for the N-time symmetry. An order parameter ϕ, which takes a value of + 1 for the sold crystalline WS2 and − 1 for the liquid phase, was employed. ϕ changed from − 1 to + 1 continuously inside the interface. The time-evolution equation29 is given by
Here n is the unit vector normal to the interface; W0 is the interfacial thickness; λ is the coupling constant given by λ = a1W0/d0, with , d0 is the capillary length defined as d0 = σ0 (Tmcp/L2); β0 is the kinetic coefficient; uint is the dimensionless undercooling at the interface; and εc and εk are anisotropy parameters of the interfacial energy and mobility, respectively. The thermodynamic and interfacial parameters are listed in Table Table1.1. Equation (4) was discretized using a second-order finite-difference scheme with grid spacing Δx = 3.698 μm and solved using a first-order Euler scheme with a time step Δ of t = 1 × 10−3 s. We set uint to be 3.1 × 10−4, assuming that the temperature of the interface is close to that of the substrate because it is not straightforward to specify the temperature of the interface during crystal growth.
Input parameters for Q-PFS.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.