Studies were included in the systematic review using the PICOT mnemonics for reviews (Table ā(Table11).
PICOT
Study designs: Quantitative method or mixed methods
Language: All
The time period of the search strategy was chosen due to the paucity of research in this area [2, 17, 26]. Furthermore, the prioritization of adolescent health and the focus on adolescent friendly services occurred after 2000 [27]. The screening and reporting of the review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The number of hits for each database was recorded and the citations were exported to Mendeley citation software. Following this, two reviewers (ZO & FM) independently reviewed all the titles and abstracts to assess which articles are appropriate for inclusion. The full-text articles of the included abstracts were downloaded and independently reviewed to determine which articles should be included for the final assessment [25, 28].
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.