Clinical records from antemortem BrS cases (n = 6) and where SADS families had undergone evaluation at St George’s Hospital London were retrospectively reviewed before study inclusion. Inclusion criteria for SADS cases were as follows: a witnessed sudden death within 1 hour of symptoms, or last seen alive within 12 hours of death; aged 1-64 years; no prior recorded cardiac disease; no history of epilepsy; a normal full coroner’s post mortem; negative toxicology; and a normal expert cardiac pathologists’ examination (12). In total, families of 61 SADS probands with retained cardiac tissue underwent clinical evaluation at St George’s Hospital. This included assessment with 12-lead, signal-averaged, and exercise ECGs; echocardiography; and ambulatory cardiac monitoring. Among families without diagnostic features of an inherited cardiac condition, an ajmaline provocation challenge was performed according to an established protocol (13). Cases with a diagnosis of familial BrS were included in the presence of a spontaneous or drug-induced type 1 Brugada ECG pattern in the standard or high precordial leads in at least 1 first-degree relative. Antemortem BrS and familial BrS were diagnosed based on expert consensus criteria (2). Electrocardiogram criteria for a type 1 Brugada ECG pattern consisted of ST-segment elevation with coved morphology ≥2 mm in ≥1 lead among the right precordial leads.
Demographics and clinical data for SCD and control cohorts was obtained following review of the CRY-CCP database. The consensus-derived Shanghai score was calculated for each decedent with an antemortem diagnosis of BrS, and for familial BrS cases, the relative with the highest score following a diagnosis of BrS (1). SADS cases without familial evaluation data but with pathogenic or likely pathogenic SCN5A loss of function variants (as per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics [ACMG] criteria [14]) were identified from the same base cohort. Noncardiac deaths were determined by information from the referring pathologist’s autopsy and final coronial judgment.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.