Polarized light imaging of Picrosirius red staining

KM Kendelle J. Murphy
DR Daniel A. Reed
CV Claire Vennin
JC James R. W. Conway
JY Julia X. Yin
CC Cecilia R. Chambers
VL Victoria Lee
EF Elysse C. Filipe
MT Michael Trpceski
SR Shona Ritchie
ML Morghan C. Lucas
SW Sean C. Warren
JS Joanna N. Skhinas
AM Astrid Magenau
XM Xanthe L. Metcalf
JS Janett Stoehr
GM Gretel Major
AP Ashleigh Parkin
RB Romain Bidanel
RL Ruth J. Lyons
AZ Anaiis Zaratzian
MT Michael Tayao
AS Andrew Da Silva
LA Lea Abdulkhalek
AG Anthony J. Gill
AJ Amber L. Johns
AB Andrew V. Biankin
JS Jaswinder Samra
SG Sean M. Grimmond
AC Angela Chou
JG Jacky G. Goetz
MS Michael S. Samuel
JL J. Guy Lyons
AB Andrew Burgess
CC C. Elizabeth Caldon
LH Lisa G. Horvath
RD Roger J. Daly
NG Nikolaj Gadegaard
YW Yingxiao Wang
OS Owen J. Sansom
JM Jennifer P. Morton
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Polarized light microscopy was performed on fixed, deparaffinized, and rehydrated 4-μm sections stained with 0.1% Picrosirius red (Polysciences, 29401-250). Polarized light signal of fibrillar collagen was taken using an Olympus U-Pot polarizer and an Olympus U-ANT transmitted light analyzer fitted to a DM4000 microscope (Leica). Quantification of birefringent signal was analyzed using ImageJ. Briefly, hue-saturation balance thresholding was applied (high birefringence/red-orange 0>H<29 | 0>S<255 | 70>B<255, medium birefringence/yellow 30>H<44 | 0>S<255 | 70>B<255, and low birefringence/green 45>H<245 | 0>S<255 | 70>B<255). Relative area of fibers was then calculated as percentage of total fibers (0>H<245 | 0>S<255 | 70>B<255).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A