2.5. Modifications in the awFC approach

SA Sondos Ayyash
AD Andrew D. Davis
GA Gésine L. Alders
GM Glenda MacQueen
SS Stephen C. Strother
SH Stefanie Hassel
MZ Mojdeh Zamyadi
SA Stephen R. Arnott
JH Jacqueline K. Harris
RL Raymond W. Lam
RM Roumen Milev
DM Daniel J. Müller
SK Sidney H. Kennedy
SR Susan Rotzinger
BF Benicio N. Frey
LM Luciano Minuzzi
GH Geoffrey B. Hall
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Building on the awFC approach proposed by Bowman et al. (2012), our current study utilized independent component analysis (ICA) and FATCAT to extract networks of regions of interest, rather than performing cluster analysis as outlined in Bowman et al. (2012). The singular value decomposition (SVD) clustering process implemented by Bowman et al. (2012) is computationally expensive for a matrix of size n × m and becomes increasingly more complex between each region pair as the number of ROIs increases (Vasudevan & Ramakrishna, 2019). ICA, on the other hand, reveals distinct spatial maps, across healthy and clinical study populations (Juneja, Rana, & Agrawal, 2016; Vergun et al., 2016). ICA is a powerful methodology, and is straightforward to apply with FATCAT's recommended pipeline involving FSL's MELODIC (Griffanti, 2019; Nascimento et al., 2017).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A