High-Resolution Measurements of the Temperature Response of Leaf Respiration.

MH Mary A. Heskel
OO Odhran S. O’Sullivan
PR Peter B. Reich
MT Mark G. Tjoelker
LW Lasantha K. Weerasinghe
AP Aurore Penillard
JE John J. G. Egerton
DC Danielle Creek
KB Keith J. Bloomfield
JX Jen Xiang
FS Felipe Sinca
ZS Zsofia R. Stangl
AT Alberto Martinez-de la Torre
KG Kevin L. Griffin
CH Chris Huntingford
VH Vaughan Hurry
PM Patrick Meir
MT Matthew H. Turnbull
OA Owen K. Atkin
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

At each field site, replicate branches of sunlit leaves were used to generate high-resolution R–T curves (see Supporting Information for details). In brief, whole replicate leaves from these branches, or shoot segments for conifers and small-leaved species, were placed in a T-controlled, well-mixed cuvette, and allowed to adapt to darkness for 30 min. Leaf cuvettes were T controlled via a thermostatically controlled circulating water bath as in O’Sullivan et al. (27) and Heskel et al. (34), or via a Peltier system (3010-GWK1 Gas-Exchange Chamber; Walz, Heinz Walz GmbH). After the 30-min dark adaption period, the cuvette chamber was cooled to 10 °C. Thereafter, the cuvette chamber was heated continuously at a rate of 1 °C min−1 until a maximum rate of respiration was reached (generally leaf T between 55 and 70 °C), although only data up to T = 45 °C was used in our model. The net release of CO2 from leaves was recorded at 30-s intervals. Postmeasurement, each replicate leaf was removed from the cuvette, placed in a drying oven at ∼60 °C for a minimum of 2 d, and weighed afterward, so that rates could be expressed on a dry-mass basis (nmol CO2 g−1 s−1).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A