Coronary angiography and AAR calculation

TB Tamás Baranyai
ZG Zoltán Giricz
ZV Zoltán V. Varga
GK Gábor Koncsos
DL Dominika Lukovic
AM András Makkos
MS Márta Sárközy
NP Noémi Pávó
AJ András Jakab
CC Csilla Czimbalmos
HV Hajnalka Vágó
ZR Zoltán Ruzsa
LT Levente Tóth
RG Rita Garamvölgyi
BM Béla Merkely
RS Rainer Schulz
MG Mariann Gyöngyösi
PF Péter Ferdinandy
ask Ask a question
Favorite

All animals underwent coronary angiography according to the protocol established by the catheterization laboratory. Anterograde flow in the artery before and after balloon inflation was characterized using the TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) system [33]. TIMI myocardial perfusion grade and myocardial blush grade were assessed visually on the angiogram and made by expert interventional cardiologist, and all data were entered prospectively into a database. Myocardial blush grade has been defined as follows: 0, no myocardial blush or contrast density; 1, minimal myocardial blush or contrast density; 2, moderate myocardial blush or contrast density but less than that obtained during angiography of a contralateral or ipsilateral non–infarct-related coronary artery; and 3, normal myocardial blush or contrast density, comparable with that obtained during angiography of a contralateral or ipsilateral non–infarct-related coronary artery. When myocardial blush persisted (“staining”), this phenomenon suggested leakage of contrast medium into the extravascular space and was graded 0 [34, 35]. No digital techniques were used. The AAR was established by using the modified APPROACH score [36].

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A