2.2. Study design and influenza screening

DB Daniel Bengtsson
KS Kamran Safi
AA Alexis Avril
WF Wolfgang Fiedler
MW Martin Wikelski
GG Gunnar Gunnarsson
JE Johan Elmberg
CT Conny Tolf
BO Björn Olsen
JW Jonas Waldenström
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Mallards were caught, sampled and selected for GPS tagging over a period of 3 days (25–27 October 2010) during the peak of autumn migration. All captured mallards were sampled for IAV by fresh faecal samples, if available, or cloacal swabs, the latter method having been reported to yield a lower detectability [38]. The samples were immediately taken to the laboratory, RNA extracted and RRT-PCR amplified for detection of the IAV matrix gene (described in [26]), while the ducks were kept in cardboard boxes at the trap (for 3–5 h). In total, 40 juvenile (first calendar year) mallards were used in the telemetry experiment, of which 24 were males and 16 were females. In terms of LPAIV, 50% of each gender were infected at the beginning of the study.

If mallards were recaptured and sampled as part of the continuous sampling scheme, which continued during the study, the infection status on that day was linked to movements recorded after the recapture. Mallards used in this study changed infection status on average 1.4 times (s.d. = 1.7) and the average daily recapture rate was 0.35 (s.d. = 0.3) for an average monitoring duration of 25 days (s.d. = 13). It should be noted that the studied mallards experienced all the selective pressures and subsequent decision-making processes nature brings, rather than a confined laboratory environment that can possibly mask ecological effects of infection (or result in ecologically irrelevant behavioural artefacts).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A