Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings

AE Agnès Espana
HS Henrik Seth
JJ Julie Jézéquel
TH Tingting Huang
DB Delphine Bouchet
ML Marylin Lepleux
HG Hélène Gréa
KB Karl Bechter
MS Marion Schneider
EH Eric Hanse
LG Laurent Groc
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were performed on CA1 pyramidal cells as previously described [39]. The pipette solution contained (in mM): 130 Cs-methanesulfonate, 2 NaCl, 20 HEPES, 0.6 EGTA, 5 QX-314, 4 Mg-ATP, and 0.4 GTP (pH ~7.3 and osmolality 280–300 mOsm). During recordings, the slice was placed in a submersion-recording chamber and perfused with ACSF at a constant flow (~2 ml m−1) at room temperature. The perfusion ACSF contained (in mM) 124 NaCl, 3 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 26 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, and 10 D-glucose (gassed with 95% O2/5% CO2; pH 7.35). Picrotoxin (100 µM) was added to inhibit GABAA receptor channels. Patch pipette resistances were 3–5 MΩ. Current was recorded at a sampling frequency of 10 kHz and analog filtered at 3 kHz, using an EPC-10 amplifier (HEKA Elektronik, Lambrecht, Germany). The liquid junction potential was both measured and calculated to be about 8 mV and was not corrected for. Series resistance was monitored using a 20 ms 10 mV hyperpolarizing pulse. The series resistance was not allowed to exceed 20 MΩ in whole-cell recordings, or to change more than 20% during an experiment, otherwise the experiment was discarded. For recording of spontaneous AMPAR (−70 mV) and NMDAR (+40 mV) mediated responses, receptor kinetics as well as tonic APV-sensitive currents, we patched pyramidal cells within the CA1 cell layer. Tonic NMDA currents were recorded as the subtracted holding current at a depolarized potential of +40 mV before and after the addition of APV. For recording of evoked EPSCs, Schaffer collateral/commissural afferents were stimulated using 0.2 ms biphasic (negative/positive) constant current pulses (5–60 µA; STG 1002, Multi Channel Systems, Reutlingen, Germany) delivered through an insulated tungsten microelectrode (resistance ~ 0.5 MΩ). Stimulation electrodes were positioned in the stratum radiatum, at least 100 µm from the recorded cell, and synaptic inputs received test pulse stimulation every 5 s. Evoked and spontaneous responses were analyzed off-line using custom-made IGOR Pro (WaveMetrics, Lake Oswego, OR, USA) software. Receptor kinetics (Tau decay) was analyzed using a single exponential offset curve fit within IGOR Pro. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Statistical significance for independent samples was evaluated using paired t-test or Student’s t-test, unless otherwise indicated. Multiple comparisons were corrected for using the modified Holm-Bonferroni algorithm.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A