The nanofluid samples were fabricated at 0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 volume fraction (). For calculating the , the following equation was used:
where, Vnp, mnp, and ρnp are the volume, mass, and density of the silica nanoparticles, respectively, whereas the Vbf is the volume of the basefluid. The ρnp was provided by the manufacturer as 2 g/cm3, and the mnp were measured using a highly accurate ae-ADAM PW 214 analytical balance (Adam Equipment Ltd., Perth, Western Australia) with 10−4 g readability and ±2 × 10−4 g accuracy. Furthermore, the suspensions were then prepared through two stages. In the first stage, a magnetic stirrer device was used for 1 h to provide initial mixing between the nanopowder and the base fluid. Next, a Sonics Materials VCX 750 ultrasonic microprocessor, which is a probe type sonicator obtained from Fisher Scientific company. (Hampton, NH, USA), was used to further disperse the nanoparticles within the base fluid for 3 h. It is important to note that the ultrasonic device operated at 750 W net power output and 20 kHz with a 19 mm solid probe that is made of a high-grade titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V). Furthermore, the mixture temperature was controlled throughout the dispersion process using a BUENO BIOTECH company cooling and heating water bath (Nanjing, China), of type BGDC, with a 0.1 °C accuracy while being monitored using the ultrasonic temperature probe accessory, which is made of stainless steel and has a 1 °C accuracy. The previous suspension fabrication technique is widely used in the field and is known as the two-step nanofluid production method [30]. It is important to note that surfactants were not used in preparing the dispersions.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.