2.6. In vivo microdialysis in the rat nucleus accumbens

SK Stéphane Krief
IB Isabelle Berrebi‐Bertrand
IN Isabelle Nagmar
MG Martin Giret
SB Simon Belliard
DP David Perrin
MU Marilyne Uguen
PR Philippe Robert
JL Jeanne‐Marie Lecomte
JS Jean‐Charles Schwartz
OF Olivier Finance
XL Xavier Ligneau
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Anesthetized rats (chloral hydrate 400 mg/kg, i.p.) were positioned in a Kopf stereotaxic frame. A guide cannula (CMA/12 microdialysis probe, Phymep) was implanted into the nucleus accumbens (anterior‐posterior, +1.2 mm from bregma; medial‐lateral, +0.18 mm; dorsal‐ventral, −5.8 mm from dura) according to the atlas of Paxinos and Watson.30 It was secured with dental cement and anchor screws into the skull. Rats were single‐housed for postoperative recovery for at least 5 days. Then, microdialysis experiments were performed as described previously25 by use of a CMA/12 microdialysis probe (2‐mm length) to measure the effects on extracellular DA of vehicle (methylcellulose 1% in water, 5 ml/kg, p.o.), or solriamfetol (30 and 100 mg/kg, p.o.).

Male OF1 mice (22–25 g) were fasted for 16 h before p.o. administration of vehicle (methylcellulose 1% in water, 10 ml/kg, p.o.) or of solriamfetol (30 and 100 mg/kg, p.o.). Ninety minutes after the treatments, animals were killed. The brain was dissected out and homogenized in 10 volumes (w/v) of ice‐cold 0.4 N perchloric acid. The clear supernatant that was obtained after centrifugation (2000 g for 30 min at 4℃) was stored at −20℃ before the level of tele‐methylhistamine was measured by enzyme immunoassay as described previously.31

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A