The apparent seroprevalence was computed as the proportion of individuals with a reactive result in the IgM or IgG band. We compared groups using the Pearson Χ2 or the Fisher’s exact test, when the assumptions for the Χ2 test did not hold. To measure the association of participants’ characteristics and IgM, IgG, and IgM or IgG seroprevalence, we computed the odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI adjusted for age, gender, educational level and nationality (except the occupational group that was not adjusted for education) using a logistic regression in SPSS V.27.
We estimated the true prevalence and 95% credible intervals (95% CrI) using Bayesian inference, considering a uniform prior distribution for sensitivity ranging from 0.65 to 0.97, and specificity between 0.83 and 1, as described by Speybroeck et al.10 Estimates were obtained using the ‘prevalence’ and ‘rjags’ package in R.11
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.