2.13. Negative Staining Electron Microscopy and Image Processing

AH Alexandra Hauser
GC George Carnell
KH Kathrin Held
GS Guidenn Sulbaran
NT Nadine Tischbierek
LR Lisa Rogers
GP Georgios Pollakis
PT Paul Tonks
MH Michael Hoelscher
SD Song Ding
RS Rogier W. Sanders
CG Christof Geldmacher
QS Quentin Sattentau
WW Winfried Weissenhorn
JH Jonathan L. Heeney
DP David Peterhoff
RW Ralf Wagner
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

HIV Env proteins were visualized by negative-stain electron microscopy (EM) using 3–4 µL aliquots at concentrations of 0.1–0.2 mg/mL. Samples were applied for 10 s onto a mica carbon film and transferred to 400-mesh Cu grid that had been glow discharged at 20 mA for 30 s and then negatively stained with 2% (wt/vol) Sodium silicotungstate (SST) for 30 s. Previous to data collection, the grids were screened to assess stain quality and particle distribution. Data were collected on an FEI Tecnai T12 LaB6-EM operating at 120 kV accelerating voltage with a pixel size of 2.8 Å on the specimen plane using a Gatan Orius 1000 CCD Camera. On average, 30–40 micrographs were collected per sample. Classification of closed and open trimers was performed as described [16]. Briefly, two-dimensional (2D) class averaging was performed with the software Relion [37], using 35,829 particles for the analysis of ConCv2 KIKO; 56,407 particles for ConCv4 KIKO; and 55,248 particles for ConCv5 KIKO. The 2-D classes were then segregated into three structural groups, closed or open-native particles and non-native particles.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A