Inhibition of forskolin stimulated cAMP accumulation assays

BW Bryony L. Winters
GG Gabrielle C. Gregoriou
SK Sarah A. Kissiwaa
OW Oliver A. Wells
DM Danashi I. Medagoda
SH Sam M. Hermes
NB Neil T. Burford
AA Andrew Alt
SA Sue A. Aicher
EB Elena E. Bagley
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

CHO-OPRD1 cells were grown to confluence then harvested and resuspended at 1e6 cells per ml in assay buffer (HBSS+25 mM HEPES,+0.05% BSA). Increasing concentrations of BMS-986187 (30 nl of 100 × final concentration in 100% DMSO) were added to separate rows of 1,536-well white solid NT plates by acoustic dispense using an Echo-550 (Labcyte, CA). Next, 1 μl of increasing concentrations of naloxone (at 3 × final concentration in assay buffer) were added to separate columns of the plates. Next, 1 μl of cells (1,000 cells per well) were added to all wells followed by 1 μl of forskolin (3 × final concentration in assay buffer). Plates were lidded and incubated for 45 min at RT. Incubations were terminated by the addition of Lance-Ultra cAMP detection reagent (1.5 μl of Eu-cryptate-labelled cAMP tracer in lysis buffer, followed by 1.5 μl of U-light-conjugated anti-cAMP antibody in lysis buffer). After a 1 h incubation at RT, time-resolved fluorescence was detected on a Viewlux or Envision plate reader (PerkinElmer) with excitation at 337 nm and emission reads at 615 and 665 nm. The ratiometric data (665 nm read/615 nm read) × 10,000 were then converted to cAMP (nM) based on a standard curve for cAMP (replacing the cell addition step) run at the same time and under identical conditions to the assay. Lance-Ultra cAMP detection reagents were from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. All other chemicals, unless otherwise specified, were from Sigma.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A