Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). CTL and M-Obese groups were compared using Student’s t-test (p< 0.05). The main outcome measurements were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (p< 0.05). Glass’s Delta, for effect size (ES) evaluation, was also calculated and physiological relevance was interpreted as small (d = 0.2), medium (d = 0.5), or large (d = 0.8).
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.