The rationale that guided this choice was not determined by a specific symptomatology (i.e., anxiety, depression, insomnia, and all possible combinations between these symptoms); rather, a quantitative criterion was chosen that is consistent with the perspective of allostatic load. Thus, positivity or negativity to PHQ-9, GAD-7, and ISI clinical cutoffs was used to identify four severity symptoms profiles: all indexes negative (Profile_0), equal or above cutoffs either in one (Profile_1), two (Profile_2), or all of the three scales (Profile_3). We evaluated how overall IES-R distress and its three components are distributed over those profiles.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.