Severity Symptom Index and Stress Response

LM Luca Moderato
DL Davide Lazzeroni
AO Annalisa Oppo
FD Francesco Dell’Orco
PM Paolo Moderato
GP Giovambattista Presti
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The rationale that guided this choice was not determined by a specific symptomatology (i.e., anxiety, depression, insomnia, and all possible combinations between these symptoms); rather, a quantitative criterion was chosen that is consistent with the perspective of allostatic load. Thus, positivity or negativity to PHQ-9, GAD-7, and ISI clinical cutoffs was used to identify four severity symptoms profiles: all indexes negative (Profile_0), equal or above cutoffs either in one (Profile_1), two (Profile_2), or all of the three scales (Profile_3). We evaluated how overall IES-R distress and its three components are distributed over those profiles.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A