Fiber photometry recordings were performed as previously described (24). Briefly, an optic fiber was attached to the implanted fiber by a ferrule sleeve, and then GCaMP6s was stimulated by two light-emitting diodes (LEDs), a 531-Hz sinusoidal light (Thorlabs, M470F3), band-pass filtered at 470 ± 20 nm, and a 211-Hz sinusoidal light (Thorlabs, M405FP1), band-pass filtered at 405 ± 10 nm. (Filter cube: Doric FMC4; LED driver: DC4104). The 470-nm signal evokes Ca2+-dependent emission, while the 405-nm signal evokes Ca2+-independent isosbestic control emission. Before recording, a 180-s period of GCaMP6s excitation with both light channels was used to remove the majority of baseline drift. Laser intensity at the optic fiber tip was adjusted to ~50 μW before each day of recording. GCaMP6s fluorescent signal was isolated by band-pass filtering (525 ± 25 nm), transduced by a femtowatt silicon photoreceiver (Newport, 2151), and recorded by a real-time processor (TDT RZ5P). The envelopes of 531- and 211-Hz signals were extracted in real time by the TDT program Synapse at a sampling rate of 1017.25 Hz.
Fiber recordings were analyzed using custom MATLAB scripts available on GitHub. Baseline drift due to slow photobleaching artifacts was corrected by fitting a double exponential curve to the raw trace, then the photometry trace was z-scored relative to the mean and SD of the signal. The mean z score during 10 s preceding and following an event was compared using paired t tests. Shuffled traces were generated by replacing event times with a random time between the beginning and end of the session.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.