Empathy

MU M. V. Uthaug
NM N. L. Mason
ST S. W. Toennes
JR J. T. Reckweg
EP E. B. de Sousa Fernandes Perna
KK K. P. C. Kuypers
KO K. van Oorsouw
JR J. Riba
JR J. G. Ramaekers
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The MET consists of 40 pictures of people in various emotional states, with 50% being positive and 50% negative (Dziobek et al. 2008). To assess cognitive empathy (CE), participants were asked to select the emotion word, out of four words, that matched the depicted emotion. To assess emotional empathy (EE), participants were asked to rate on a scale from 1 to 9 “how aroused does this picture make you feel” (implicit EE) and “how concerned do you feel for this person” (explicit EE). Implicit EE and explicit EE ratings per valence (positive and negative) were used as dependent variables. Previous validity and reliability analysis of the MET have shown to be in the good to highly satisfactory range (Dziobek et al. 2008), and previous studies have found it to be sensitive to the effects of psychedelics (Hysek et al. 2013; Kuypers et al. 2014; Kuypers et al. 2017a; Mason et al. 2019; Pokorny et al. 2017; Preller et al. 2015).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A