2.4. HPLC Analysis of Antioxidant Compounds

HK Hyung Don Kim
JL Ji Yeon Lee
JP Jeong-Yong Park
DK Dong Hwi Kim
MK Min Hye Kang
HS Hyun-A Seong
KS Kyung Hye Seo
YJ Yun-Jeong Ji
ask Ask a question
Favorite

HPLC analysis (Agilent 1200 series; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) of the phenol-rich fraction was conducted according to Kim et al. [17]. CLF1 and CLF2 (5 g) were redissolved in water and then fractionated with a mixture of ethyl acetate and ether (1:1 = v/v). Each fraction was dissolved in methanol (10 mg/mL each) following concentration under reduced pressure.

We applied the modified gradient conditions for the HPLC analysis according to Kim et al. [17]. For qualitative and quantitative analysis, a reverse phase system with synergistic fusion RP column (250 × 4.6 mm, 4 μm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) was used at 35 °C. The mobile phase consisted of 0.5% acetic acid in water and acetonitrile. The standard solutions were prepared at a constant volume with methanol and water. The elution program was as follows (B%): 2%, 5 min; 2–5%, 12 min; 5–8%, 17 min; 8–30%, 65 min; 30%, 68 min; 50%, 78 min; 100%, 100 min. The injection volume, flow rate, and wavelength were 10 μL, 1.0 mL/min, and UV 280 nm, respectively. Gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, homogentisic acid, caffeic acid, catechin, ferulic acid, ρ-coumaric acid, naringin, quercetin, and cinnamic acid were used as standards (Sigma-Aldrich). All solutions were filtered through a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF, 0.22-μm) membrane (Pall Co., Port Washington, NY, USA).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A