LC analysis of hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds

CW Chong Wang
XL Xufang Li
WN Wanshan Ning
SG Sitang Gong
FY Fengxia Yang
CF Chunxiao Fang
YG Yu Gong
DW Di Wu
MH Muhan Huang
YG Yujie Gou
SF Shanshan Fu
YR Yujie Ren
RY Ruyi Yang
YQ Yang Qiu
YX Yu Xue
YX Yi Xu
XZ Xi Zhou
ask Ask a question
Favorite

For quality control of the metabolomic analysis, we pipetted 10 μL of each of the 30 plasma samples to pool a mixture, which was equally separated into 4 parts. When running sample sets on the UPLC column, 1 part of the control sample was first added, and the remaining 3 parts were sequentially injected after per 10 samples.

The sample extracts of hydrophilic compounds were analyzed using the ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) of a LC-MS/MS system (Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM A system, MS, QTRAP® 6500+ System). The samples were injected onto a Waters HSS T3 column (1.8 µm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm). The column temperature, flow rate and injection volume were set 40 °C, 0.4 mL/min and 2 μL, respectively. Mobile phase A (2% ACN, 0.1% FA) and mobile phase B (90% ACN, 0.1% FA) were used to establish a 12 min separation gradient (0 min - 5% B; 11 min - 90% B; 12 min - 5% B).

The sample extracts of hydrophobic compounds were also analyzed using the same UPLC (Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM A system, MS, QTRAP® 6500+ System). The samples were injected onto a Thermo Accucore™ C30 column (2.6 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm). The column temperature, flow rate and injection volume were set 45 °C, 0.35 mL/min and 2 μL, respectively. Mobile phase A (2% ACN, 0.1% FA) and mobile phase B (90% ACN, 0.1% FA) were used to establish a 20 min separation gradient (0 min - 20% B; 2 min - 30% B; 4 min - 60% B; 9 min - 85% B; 14 min - 90% B; 15.5 min - 95% B; 17.3 min - 90% B; 20 min - 20% B).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A