Advanced Search
Published: Sep 5, 2020 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.5004 Views: 5244
Reviewed by: PRASHANT SHARMAAnna SloutskinBalaji Olety Amaranath
Abstract
In this report, we present the implementation of mass cytometry for intracellular staining using fixed whole blood. In our assay described here, 250 µl of whole blood, is stimulated in vitro with PMA/ionomycin (or left unstimulated), in the presence of secretion inhibitors (brefeldin A and monensin), lysed-fixed using SMART TUBE buffers, barcoded (optional), surface stained, fixed, stained for intracellular markers, fixed and DNA stained. Using 250 µl of whole blood from a healthy donor, we show that the expression of major lineage populations such as T cells, B cells, NK cells and monocytes, as well as cytokines such as CD4+ and CD8+ IFNγ and TNFα across multiple batches (n = 27) is consistent, with the co-efficient of variation (CVs) ≤ 21%, implying minimum inter-variability. For each major cell type, the percentage is reported as a percent of singlets. The percentage of cytokine expression in response to stimulation is reported as a percent of the immediate parent cell type. This protocol has a number of benefits: from a biological perspective, it can be applied to clinical studies especially where blood draw volumes are limiting. Technically, the protocol can be adapted for barcoding, which adds the benefits of more uniform sample staining as well as antibody conservation especially for large study cohorts. Finally, for studies involving infectious diseases including the current global COVID-19 pandemic, this protocol permits infectious samples to be fixed prior to processing and staining, thereby reducing biosafety risks.
Keywords: CyTOFBackground
Non-invasive methods to obtain biological samples and single cell technologies are much sought after, as they provide an opportunity to comprehensively study human diseases. Blood not only provides for a minimally-invasive, cost effective and readily accessible source of immunological sample, but whole blood stimulation also serves as the closest mimic of the in vivo condition. Single-cell Mass Cytometry (or Cytometry by Time of Flight mass spectrometry, CyTOF) is ideally suited to broad profiling of the immune system, since it allows for > 40 parameter panels, with little to no spillover between channels, which is a significant advancement over the procedural limitations of fluorescence flow cytometry (Leipold et al., 2015). Conversely, cell acquisition speed is significantly lower, and cell loss significantly higher, for CyTOF compared to fluorescence flow cytometry. In this report, we show the establishment of a reference panel of 39-anti human antibodies for mass cytometry that broadly identifies the major immune cell types, well established T and B cell subpopulations, activation markers, cytolytic markers and cytokines. To characterize these immune cell lineages and their functional states, the panel of anti-human heavy metal-conjugated monoclonal antibodies was selected to target the epitopes shown in Table 3, and to be compatible with fixed whole blood samples (Fernandez and Maecker, 2015 and our unpublished data). The panel described here, comprises an almost equal number of pre-made and in-house conjugates. To build this panel, we implemented the recommended panel design guidelines for mass cytometry. Low-abundance targets were allocated to higher-sensitivity channels and antibodies were designated to channels to minimize potential spectral overlap (Takahashi et al., 2017). All antibodies in the designed panel were then titrated to best discriminate the positive population from the negative. This panel can be further customized for specific hypothesis driven studies. In addition, by integrating barcoding (Behbehani et al., 2014) within this framework, we also demonstrate the compatibility of this panel with large clinical studies, to minimize technical variability. The ability to freeze fixed blood samples is also convenient for assembly of sample sets for retrospective batched analysis, with decreased biosafety risks in the setting of infectious disease. With regard to SARS-CoV-2 or other infectious agents that might be present, whole blood fixation by the method described here has not been proven to be fully inactivating. But given the known effects of fixation on viral infectivity (Möller et al., 2015), it provides an increased level of safety.
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Procedure
Category
Immunology > Immune cell staining > Mass cytometry
Cell Biology > Cell imaging > Fixed-cell imaging
Molecular Biology > Protein > Detection
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link