评估土壤微生物组抑制高粱独脚金感染的机制

Tamera Taylor; Jiregna Daksa; Mahdere Z. Shimels; Desalegn W. Etalo; Benjamin Thiombiano; Aimee Walmsey; Alexander J. Chen; Harro J. Bouwmeester; Jos M. Raaijmakers; Siobhan M. Brady; Dorota Kawa

doi:10.21769/BioProtoc.5058

Improve Research Reproducibility A Bio-protocol resource

提交稿件
订阅
CN
- EN - English
- CN - 中文

Peer-reviewed

Evaluating Mechanisms of Soil Microbiome Suppression of Striga Infection in Sorghum

评估土壤微生物组抑制高粱独脚金感染的机制

TT Tamera Taylor

JD Jiregna Daksa

MS Mahdere Z. Shimels

DE Desalegn W. Etalo

BT Benjamin Thiombiano

AW Aimee Walmsey

AC Alexander J. Chen

HB Harro J. Bouwmeester

JR Jos M. Raaijmakers

SB Siobhan M. Brady

DK Dorota Kawa email

发布: 2024年09月05日第14卷第17期 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.5058 浏览次数: 1395

评审: Xiaofei LiangSteven RunoKerui Huang

PDF

Q&A

引用

Cited by

参见作者原研究论文

The authors used this protocol in:

Cover of Cell Reports, featuring study using the protocol.

Apr 2024

实验方案合集

Cell Imaging - A Special Collection for Cell Bio 2023

相关实验方案

基于TMV-GFP系统的植物病原菌候选效应子功能筛选流程

Peng Cao [...] Yuyan An

2025年04月20日 986 阅读

病毒分离与水稻原生质体感染实验

Yu Huang [...] Yi Li

2025年07月20日 1409 阅读

耐盐耐旱细菌分离株中生长素、铁载体和氰化氢产量的定量评估及其对黄瓜生长的作用

Zeinab Fotoohiyan and Ali Salehi Sardoei

2025年10月05日 67 阅读

Abstract

The root parasitic weed Striga hermonthica has a devastating effect on sorghum and other cereal crops in Sub-Saharan Africa. Available Striga management strategies are rarely sufficient or not widely accessible or affordable. Identification of soil- or plant-associated microorganisms that interfere in the Striga infection cycle holds potential for development of complementary biological control measures. Such inoculants should be preferably based on microbes native to the regions of their application. We developed a method to assess microbiome-based soil suppressiveness to Striga with a minimal amount of field-collected soil. We previously used this method to identify the mechanisms of microbe-mediated suppression of Striga infection and to test individual microbial strains. Here, we present protocols to assess the functional potential of the soil microbiome and individual bacterial taxa that adversely affect Striga parasitism in sorghum via three major known suppression mechanisms. These methods can be further extended to other Striga hosts and other root parasitic weeds.

Key features

• This protocol provides a detailed description of the methods used in Kawa et al. [1].

• This protocol is optimized to assess soil suppressiveness to Striga infection by using natural field-collected soil and the same soil sterilized by gamma-radiation.

• This protocol is optimized to test bacterial (and not fungal) isolates.

• This protocol can be easily extended to other host–parasite–microbiome systems.

Keywords: Striga hermonthica (独脚金)

Suppressive soils (抑制性土壤)

Haustorium-inducing factors (寄生吸器诱导因子)

Background

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) is among the five most important crops in the world and a staple food and forage cereal in Sub-Saharan Africa [2]. Sorghum is grown in diverse agroecological zones, predominantly by small-hold farmers [3]. Most sorghum cultivars are suited to arid, nutrient-depleted soils; yet, sorghum productivity is challenged by pathogens. The parasitic weed Striga hermonthica causes substantial sorghum yield losses, affecting approximately 60% of Sub-Saharan African farmlands [4].

Striga is a root parasite that infects cereal crop species, including sorghum, rice, and pearl millet [5]. Striga’s life cycle is dependent on specific compounds exuded from the host roots into the surrounding soil. Striga germinates upon the perception of strigolactones, while haustorium-inducing factors (HIFs) initiate the development of a haustorium, a specialized organ that allows Striga to attach to and penetrate the root tissue [6–8]. Upon reaching the host vasculature, Striga connects its own xylem vessels with its host vasculature [7], enabling the parasite to withdraw water and nutrients from its host, thereby compromising host fitness and productivity [9].

Striga management includes manual weed removal, chemical control methods, and breeding for host resistance [10]. Chemical application poses a challenge in rain-fed agricultural systems, while commercial sorghum varieties show only partial resistance and are not always accessible or suited to the agricultural practices of small-holder farmers [11]. Recently, the functional potential of the soil microbiome to suppress Striga infection has been described. These include microbial isolates that are pathogenic to Striga [12] and those that degrade HIFs or that induce physical barriers to Striga parasitism in host roots [1]. Further development of microbial-based agricultural solutions against Striga will require screening candidate microbes native to soils in Striga-infested regions.

Here, we present a set of protocols to assess the contribution of soil microbiome to Striga infection levels and individual soil-borne bacterial isolates to Striga suppression-associated mechanisms. The soil plug assay enables testing Striga suppressiveness of multiple soils collected from agricultural fields. Striga resistance modes are typically described as pre-attachment resistance [reduced germination and (pre)haustorium formation], and post-attachment resistance (when parasite fails to penetrate the root tissue and/or establish the vascular connection with the host). To distinguish which stage of Striga infection the soil microbiome affects, we recommend extracting and testing host root exudates in an in vitro Striga germination assay and a haustorium formation assay. Preparation of host root cross-sections and their histological staining allows quantification of aerenchyma and suberization, both associated with microbe-mediated suppression of post-attachment stages of Striga infection [1]. To test which isolates affect haustorium formation and induce changes in host root cellular anatomy, we present an in vitro haustorium induction assay and a method of sorghum inoculation in sand, respectively. The presented protocols can be easily adapted and applied to multiple sorghum cultivars and other Striga hosts.

Materials and reagents

Biological materials

Sorghum bicolor seeds. We recommend using Striga-susceptible sorghum varieties, e.g., Shanqui Red, and the Striga-resistant cultivar SRN39 as positive and negative controls for Striga germination, respectively [13,14] [Shanqui Red: PI 656025, SRN39: PI 656027, available from Germplasm Resource Information Network (GRIN-Global)]
Striga hermonthica seeds (note that working with Striga in certain locations/countries requires permits (e.g., Federal Noxious Weed Permit issued by APHIS in US) and must be performed in contained-type facilities (e.g., https://crf.ucdavis.edu)
Field-collected soil of interest
Bacterial isolates of interest

Reagents

Commercial household bleach [Clorox containing 8.25% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)]
Captan 50% wettable powder (active ingredient: N-Trichloromethylthio-4-cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboximide, 48.9%) (Arysta Life Science, CAS number: 133-06-2)
Tween-20 (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number: 9005-64-5)
Calcium nitrate (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number: 13477-34-4)
Potassium nitrate (Spectrum, CAS number: 7757-79-1)
Potassium phosphate (Sigma, CAS number: 7778-77-0)
Magnesium sulphate (Research Products International, CAS number: 7487-88-9)
EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) ferric salt (Sigma, CAS number: 18154-32-0)
Boric acid (Fisher Chemical, CAS number: 10043-35-3)
Manganese chloride (J.T. Baker, CAS number: 13446-34-9)
Zinc sulphate (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number: 7446-20-0)
Copper sulphate (Spectrum, CAS number: 7758-99-8)
Sodium molybdate (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number: 10102-40-6)
Sodium chloride (Fisher Chemical, CAS number: 7647-14-5)
Bacto^TM yeast extract (Thermo Fisher, catalog number: 212750)
N-acetylglucosamine (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number: 7512-17-6)
Tryptic soy broth (TSB), Bacto soybean-casein digest medium (Difco, catalog number: 211825)
Bactoagar (agar bacteriological) (Difco, catalog number: 214530)
Agarose (VWR, CAS number: 9012-36-6)
GR-24rac (StrigoLab, CAS number: 76974-79-3)
DMBQ (2,6-methoxy-1,4-benzoquinone), 97% (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number: 530-55-2)
Fluorol yellow 088 (Santa Cruz Biotech., CAS number: 81-37-8)
Aniline blue (Fisher Chemical, CAS number: 28631-66-5)
Toluidine blue O (J.T. Baker, CAS number: 92-31-9)
Lactic acid (Acros Organics, catalog number: 189870010, CAS number: 79-33-4)
Syringic acid, 95% (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number: 530-57-4)
Vanillic acid, 98% (Alfa Aesar, CAS number: 121-34-6)
Formalin (37% formaldehyde) (Fisher Chemical, CAS number: 50-00-0)
95% ethanol (Koptec, CAS number: 64-17-5)
Glacial acetic acid (Fisher Chemical, CAS number: 64-19-7)
Glycerol (Fisher Chemical, CAS number: 56-81-5)
DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number: 67-68-5)
Sodium chloride (Fisher Chemical, CAS number: 7647-14-5)
Methanol (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number: 67-56-1)

Solutions

Half-strength modified Hoagland media (see Recipes)
Bacterial growth media (see Recipes)
Formalin-Aceto-Alcohol (FAA) solution (see Recipes)

Recipes

Half-strength modified Hoagland media

Stock solution	Reagent	g/L stock	Volume (mL) stock per 1 L of final solution
0.5 M calcium nitrate	Ca(NO₃)₂·4H₂O	118.08	5
1.0 M potassium nitrate	KNO₃	101.11	2.5
0.1 M potassium phosphate	KH₂PO₄	13.609	0.5
0.5 M magnesium sulphate	MgSO₄·7H₂O	123.24	2
98.6 mM EDTA ferric salt	C₁₀H₁₂FeN₂NaO₈·3H₂O	41.52	1
Micronutrient stock:			1
46.3 mM boric acid	H₃BO₃	2.86
9.1 mM manganese chloride	MnCl₂·4H₂O	1.81
0.77 mM zinc sulphate	ZnSO₄·7H₂O	0.22
0.32 mM copper sulphate	CuSo₄·5H₂O	0.08
0.52 mM sodium molybdate	Na₂MoO₄·2H₂O	0.126

Store at 4 °C.

Bacterial growth media
Reagent Final concentration g/L final solution
Sodium chloride 0.5% 5
Potassium dihydrogen phosphate 0.1% 1
Bacto^TM yeast extract 0.01% 0.1
N-acetylglucosamine 2 mM 0.44
Store at room temperature.

Formalin-Aceto-Alcohol (FAA) solution
Reagent Final concentration mL/L final solution
Formalin (37% formaldehyde) 10% 100
95% ethanol 50% 500
Glacial acetic acid 5% 50
Store at room temperature.

Laboratory supplies

4 mm mesh
50 mL conical tubes
Whatman qualitative filter paper, Grade 1, 90 mm diameter (Sigma-Aldrich)
Sterile plastic Petri plate, 100 mm diameter
Parafilm
Aluminum foil
Cones, Depot tree pots 40 cm (Greenhouse Megastore)
Gauze pads
Rubber bands
Ethanol 200 proof (KOPTEC, CAS number: 64-17-5)
High-purity filtered sand, effective size 0.45–0.55 mm (Covia)
Forceps
Pycnometers, 50 mL (KLM BioScientific, Borosilicate 3.3 Glass)
Transparent tray
Whatman glass microfiber filters, grade GF/A, 13 mm diameter discs (Sigma-Aldrich)

Equipment

Laminar flow cabinet (Labconco, Purifier Biological Safety Cabinet, model: 3440009 LS)
Hot stirrer plate (VWR, model: VMS-C7)
Stereomicroscope (Nikon, model: SMZ 1500)
Balance (Sartorius, Explorer Pro, model: E0114)
Orbital shaker (GeneMate, model: Orbital Shaker Variable)
Centrifuge for 50 mL tubes (Eppendorf, model: 5810 R)
Vibratome (Leica, model: VT1000 S)
Fluorescent confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, model: LSM 700)
Vacuum chamber (SP Bel-Art)
Microbiological incubator shaker (Innova, model: 4400 Incubator Shaker)
Autoclave (Tuttnauer, model 5596SP-1V)
Spectrophotometer (Eppendorf, model: BioPhotometer plus)

Software and datasets

ImageJ version 1.53g (https://imagej.net/ij/download.html) with Cell Counter plug-in

Procedure

English

中文翻译

文章信息

稿件历史记录

提交日期: May 4, 2024

接收日期: Jul 17, 2024

在线发布日期: Aug 9, 2024

出版日期: Sep 5, 2024

版权信息

如何引用

Taylor, T., Daksa, J., Shimels, M. Z., Etalo, D. W., Thiombiano, B., Walmsey, A., Chen, A. J., Bouwmeester, H. J., Raaijmakers, J. M., Brady, S. M. and Kawa, D. (2024). Evaluating Mechanisms of Soil Microbiome Suppression of Striga Infection in Sorghum. Bio-protocol 14(17): e5058. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.5058.