发布: 2017年08月05日第7卷第15期 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2419 浏览次数: 15034
评审: Xiao LiAnonymous reviewer(s)
Abstract
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) are engineered stem cells, which exhibit properties very similar to embryonic stem cells (ES cells; Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2016). Both iPS cells and ES cells have an extraordinary self-renewal capacity and can differentiate into all cell types of our body, including hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells and dendritic cells (DC) derived thereof. This makes iPS cells particularly well suited for studying molecular mechanisms of diseases, drug discovery and regenerative therapy (Grskovic et al., 2011; Bellin et al., 2012; Robinton and Daley, 2012).
DC are the major antigen presenting cells of the immune system and thus they are key players in modulating and directing immune responses (Merad et al., 2013). DC patrol peripheral and interface tissues (e.g., lung, intestine and skin) to detect invading pathogens, and upon activation they migrate to lymph nodes to activate and prime lymphocytes.
DC comprise a phenotypically heterogeneous family with functionally specialized subsets (Schlitzer and Ginhoux, 2014). Generally, classical DC (cDC) and plasmacytoid DC (pDC) are distinguished, exhibiting a classical and plasma cell-like DC morphology, respectively. cDC recognize a multitude of pathogens and secrete proinflammatory cytokines upon activation, while pDC are specialized to detect intracellular pathogens and secrete type I interferons (Merad et al., 2013; Schlitzer and Ginhoux, 2014). cDC are further divided into cross-presenting cDC1 and conventional cDC2, in the human system referred to as CD141+ Clec9a+ cDC1 and CD1c+ CD14- cDC2. Human pDC are characterized as CD303+ CD304+ (Jongbloed et al., 2010; Joffre et al., 2012; Swiecki and Colonna, 2015).
To investigate subset specification and function of human DC, we established a protocol to generate cDC1, cDC2 and pDC in vitro from human iPS cells (or ES cells) (Sontag et al., 2017). Therefore, we differentiated iPS cells (or ES cells), via mesoderm commitment and hemato-endothelial specification, into CD43+ CD31+ hematopoietic progenitors. Subsequently, those were seeded onto inactivated OP9 stromal cells with FLT3L, SCF, GM-CSF and IL-4 or FLT3L, SCF and GM-CSF to specify cDC1 and cDC2, or cDC1 and pDC, respectively.
Background
DC and their development have mostly been studied in mice (Belz and Nutt, 2012; Merad et al., 2013; Schlitzer and Ginhoux, 2014). Owing to their rarity in non-lymphoid tissues and the restricted access to human lymphoid tissues, studying DC in humans is challenging (Jongbloed et al., 2010; Villadangos and Shortman, 2010). Yet, understanding developmental pathways, origins and mechanisms during DC subset specification is important in order to generate autologous DC subsets in vitro for therapeutic applications (e.g., anti-tumor agents). iPS cells (and ES cells) with their unlimited self-renewal and differentiation potential raise hopes that DC can be generated and modified (e.g., loaded with patient and disease specific antigens) in high numbers and quality in vitro to study DC development and function and to improve DC immunotherapies (Sontag et al., 2017).
Several groups have generated monocyte derived DC from iPS cells (and ES cells) with conventional granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF)/interleukin 4 (IL-4) protocols, but such DC represent inflammatory DC and are not subset specific (Senju et al., 2007; Tseng et al., 2009; Choi et al., 2011; Senju et al., 2011; Belz and Nutt, 2012; Rossi et al., 2012; Yanagimachi et al., 2013; Li et al., 2014). From mouse studies, it is known that fms-like tyrosine kinase ligand (FLT3L) is the key cytokine for DC development and that the combination of FLT3L and GM-CSF signaling specifies DC subsets in vivo (Gilliet et al., 2002; Schmid et al., 2010). Recently, human cDC1, cDC2 and pDC were generated from cord blood (CB) with FLT3L, stem cell factor (SCF) and GM-CSF on MS5 stromal cells (Lee et al., 2015). Additionally, Poulin et al. (2010) reported on the generation of cDC1 from CB with FLT3L, SCF, GM-CSF and IL-4 in a feeder-free environment (Poulin et al., 2010). In contrast, Silk et al. (2012) described the differentiation of cDC1 in a feeder-free GM-CSF/IL-4 system (Silk et al., 2012). However, recent genome wide transcriptional profiling studies highlight the impact of microenvironmental cues during DC development, indicating that feeder support is important (Lundberg et al., 2013). Therefore, we used FLT3L, SCF, GM-CSF and IL-4 (referred to as FSG4) and FLT3L, SCF and GM-CSF (referred to as FSG) in combination with OP9 stromal cells to generate cDC1, cDC2 and pDC from iPS cell (or ES cell) derived hematopoietic progenitors.
Here we describe a two-step protocol: First, human iPS cells (or ES cells) are differentiated into hematopoietic progenitors (adapted from Kennedy et al., 2012). Second, these hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells are then further differentiated into cDC1, cDC2 and pDC (Sontag et al., 2017).
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Procedure
文章信息
版权信息
© 2017 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
如何引用
Sontag, S., Förster, M., Seré, K. and Zenke, M. (2017). Differentiation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPS Cells) and Embryonic Stem Cells (ES Cells) into Dendritic Cell (DC) Subsets. Bio-protocol 7(15): e2419. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2419.
分类
干细胞 > 多能干细胞 > 细胞诱导
细胞生物学 > 细胞分离和培养 > 细胞分化
您对这篇实验方法有问题吗?
在此处发布您的问题,我们将邀请本文作者来回答。同时,我们会将您的问题发布到Bio-protocol Exchange,以便寻求社区成员的帮助。
提问指南
+ 问题描述
写下详细的问题描述,包括所有有助于他人回答您问题的信息(例如实验过程、条件和相关图像等)。
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link