发布: 2017年05月20日第7卷第10期 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2281 浏览次数: 12552
评审: Jia LiAlberto RissoneAnonymous reviewer(s)
相关实验方案
基于扩展型CPER的快速无质粒重组正链RNA病毒构建方法:适用于IRES介导翻译系统
Hirotaka Yamamoto [...] Takausuke Fukuhara
2025年04月20日 914 阅读
Abstract
There are several in silico programs that endeavor to predict the functional impact of an individual’s sequence variation at splice donor/acceptor sites, but experimental confirmation is problematic without a source of RNA from the individual that carries the variant. With the aid of an exon trapping vector, such as pSPL3, an investigator can test whether a splice site sequence change leads to altered RNA splicing, through expression of reference and variant mini-genes in mammalian cells and analysis of the resultant RNA products.
Keywords: Splicing (剪接)Background
We wished to experimentally test the functional impact of two splice donor site variants, c.760+2T>C and c.3300+2delT, identified in the TEK gene (Souma et al., 2016). As is often the case, samples of cells or mRNA were not available from the individuals carrying these sequence variants, so we utilized the exon trapping method to serve as a functional test. DNA samples were available from patients for PCR amplification of the genomic regions of interest. If patient gDNA samples are unavailable, sequence variants can also be incorporated into wild-type sequence by methods such as PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis.
The exon trapping approach was originally developed to identify unknown exons within long stretches of genomic DNA (Duyk et al., 1990). The pSPL3 exon trapping vector was created to increase the efficiency and reliability of exon identification, and also allowed larger genomic fragments to be screened (Church et al., 1994; Nisson et al., 1994). The pSPL3 vector contains a small artificial gene composed of an SV40 promoter, an exon-intron-exon sequence with functional splice donor and acceptor sites, and a late polyadenylation signal. Within the single intron a multiple cloning site is located, into which a genomic fragment of interest is inserted to create a mini-gene expression construct.
In our example, patient and control genomic DNA fragments from the TEK gene were PCR amplified and cloned between pSPL3 vector exons V1 and V2 using XhoI and BamHI restriction sites. COS-7 cells were then transfected with the mini-gene constructs and the resulting RNA content purified. mRNA transcripts were then reverse transcribed into cDNA. Using vector exon-specific primers, cDNAs produced from the mini-gene constructs were specifically PCR amplified and Sanger sequenced. For the first splice site variant, c.760+2T>C within the 5’ splice site of exon 5, a 1,457 bp genomic fragment of the TEK gene encompassing all of intron 4, exon 5, intron 5, exon 6 and intron 6 was inserted into the construct (Figure 1A). RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing of the mini-gene expressed transcripts showed that the mutation destroyed the splice donor site, which resulted in partial intron 5 inclusion before a cryptic splice site was utilized (Figure 1C). This splicing error is predicted to result in a translational frameshift and premature termination signal, which would likely lead to transcript elimination via the nonsense-mediated decay pathway. For the second splice site variant, c.3300+2delT within the 5’ splice site of exon 22, an 831 bp genomic fragment of the TEK gene encompassing all of intron 21, exon 22 and intron 22 was inserted into the construct (Figure 1B). RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing of the mini-gene expressed transcripts revealed that the splice donor mutation led to skipping of exon 22, which is also predicted to result in a translational frameshift and premature termination signal in the genomic context of the patient (Figure 1C).
Figure 1. Exon trapping assay. Vector exons V1 and V2, are depicted as black boxes and TEK exons 5, 6, and 22 are shown in gray. Vector exon-specific primers are indicated by half-arrows in (A) and (B). Wild-type (WT) and mutant (M) splicing products, with included exon sizes in base pairs, are indicated by dashed lines above and below the construct, respectively. The locations of the splice site mutations are shown as an asterisk (*). A. Wild-type (WT-5) and mutant (M-5) genomic fragments containing TEK exons 5 and 6 were used to model the c.760+2T>C mutation. B. Wild-type (WT-22) and mutant (M-22) genomic fragments containing TEK exon 22 were used to model the c.3300+2delT mutation. C. Gel electrophoresis of RT-PCR products from transfected COS-7 cells. ‘Empty Vector’, cells transfected with vector containing no gDNA insert; ‘TF –ve’ (transfection negative), cells transfected with QIAGEN buffer EB only; ‘PCR –ve’ (PCR negative), PCR contamination control substituting water for cDNA template. Wild-type and mutant transcript content, determined by Sanger sequencing, is depicted to the right of the gel image. The additional 21 bp of intron 5 sequence identified within the M5 transcript is shown incorporating a premature termination codon between exons 5 and 6.
Materials and Reagents
Note: Genome-specific sequences are underlined, restriction sites are shown in BOLD and an extra 8 bp added to the 5’ end are shown in lowercase. 5’-CTCGAG-3’ is the recognition sequence for XhoI and 5’-GGATCC-3’ is the recognition sequence for BamHI. ‘-F’ and ‘-R’ refers to the forwards and reverse primers in a pair, respectively. Resuspend primers and make 10 μM stocks with TE buffer.
Note: Resuspend primers and make 10 μM stocks with TE buffer.
Equipment
Software
Procedure
文章信息
版权信息
© 2017 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
如何引用
Tompson, S. W. and Young, T. L. (2017). Assaying the Effects of Splice Site Variants by Exon Trapping in a Mammalian Cell Line. Bio-protocol 7(10): e2281. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2281.
分类
分子生物学 > DNA > DNA 克隆
分子生物学 > DNA > PCR
您对这篇实验方法有问题吗?
在此处发布您的问题,我们将邀请本文作者来回答。同时,我们会将您的问题发布到Bio-protocol Exchange,以便寻求社区成员的帮助。
提问指南
+ 问题描述
写下详细的问题描述,包括所有有助于他人回答您问题的信息(例如实验过程、条件和相关图像等)。
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link