Advanced Search
Published: Aug 20, 2023 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4786 Views: 197
Reviewed by: Avinash Chandra Pandey
Abstract
Ancient whole-genome duplication and triplication events have a profound impact on present-day plant genomes. However, sub genome assignments in allopolyploids can be technically challenging. The present study used a likelihood-based tool, POInT (the Polyploid Orthology Inference Tool) to model the resolution of the ancient whole-genome triplication events in Brassiceae. This protocol will showcase the application of POInT for polyploid comparative genomics studies and its potential use for future studies.
Keywords: AllopolyploidyBackground
Ancient polyploidy events are prevalent throughout the evolutionary history of flowering plants (One Thousand Plant Transcriptomes Initiative, 2019) and have contributed to the diversity of complexity of present-day species (van de Peer et al., 2009). When the sub genomes were derived from genetically distant parents, such events are termed as allopolyploidy. Post-polyploidy gene loss in allopolyploids are often unbalanced across different sub genomes (Cheng et al., 2012). The biased fractionation reshaped genomic landscape, and the gene retention/loss pattern has important implications in crop development (Qi et al., 2021). However, sub genome assignment in allopolyploids is still challenging (Edger et al., 2018).
POInT (the Polyploid Orthology Inference Tool) is a likelihood-based tool for modeling ancient polyploidy events (Conant and Wolfe, 2008; Emery et al., 2018; Hao and Conant, 2022; Conant, 2023). POInT supports user-defined ploidy levels, namely whole-genome duplication (Conant and Wolfe, 2008; Emery et al., 2018; Conant, 2020), triplication (Schoonmaker et al., 2020; Hao et al., 2021), or quadruplication (Hao et al., 2022). Using POInT, we have modeled the whole-genome triplication (WGT) events shared by the members of the tribe Brassiceae (Hao et al., 2021). The synteny-based and phylogenetically aware analysis of gene loss across different sub genomes provides statistical support for the two-step hypothesis of hexaploidy and biased fractionation across the LF, MF1, and MF2 sub genomes after the ancient WGT (Cheng et al., 2012; Tang et al., 2012). Here, we present a step-by-step guide to recreate the WGT model comparisons in Hao et al. (2021).
Software and dataset
Software
POInT (Conant and Wolfe, 2008; Emery et al., 2018; Hao and Conant, 2022; version 1.55; http://conantlab.org/POInT/POInT.html)
Input data
The input files for this case study are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12277832 (Hao et al., 2021).
Input files include:
Gene orders from four individual polyploid genomes:
i. Brassica_oleracea_POInT_geneorders.txt
ii. Brassica_rapa_POInT_geneorders.txt
iii. Crambe_hispanica_v3_POInT_geneorders.txt
iv. Sinapis_alba_POInT_geneorders.txt
Inferred ancestral pillar order: FourSpp_M2Opt3.txt
Optimal phylogenetic topology: BrBoSaCh_WGT_3rate_G1Dom_M2Opt3_Top3.tre
WGT models for use with POInT:
- WGT Null: WGT_Null_model.txt
- WGT 1Dom: WGT_2rate_G1Dom_model.txt
- WGT 1DomG3: WGT_3rate_G1Dom_model.txt
- Root-spec. WGT 1DomG3: WGT_3rate_G1Dom_brnspec_model.txt
- Root model: WGT_RootModel.txt
Procedure
© 2023 The Author(s); This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Category
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
Plant Science > Plant molecular biology > Genetic analysis
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link