Experiment: Wound Healing Experiment
Method:
Day 0:
- Conduct wound healing studies at 6-10 weeks post-transplantation.
- Add 15.5 mL tert-amyl alcohol to 25 grams of 2,2,2 tribromoethanol and dissolve overnight in a dark bottle to generate a stock solution. The subsequent solution should be diluted with PBS, dissolved overnight, and filtered through a 0.2 µm filter to generate a working solution (20 mg/ml).
- Anesthetize animal with 0.4-0.75 mg/g intra-peritoneally.
- Shave dorsal skin.
- Make 2 punch biopsies (4 wounds) in dorsal skin with a 3 mm punch biopsy.
- Save skin samples for 1) paraffin 2) frozen (OCT embedding), and 3) RNA (stored in RNA later).
- Photograph mice systematically from a fixed distance daily and analyze size of the wound by counting pixels in Adobe Photoshop (This is the wound image on Day 0).
- Each mouse should be housed singularly during the study.
Day 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 14:
- Image wounds.
- Sacrifice 2 mice per group and harvest skin for 1) paraffin 2) frozen section (OCT embedding), and 3) RNA (stored in RNA later).
- Harvest bone marrow for flow cytometry and RNA analysis (to check for Cre knock-out efficiency).
Day 3, 5, etc.:
- Image wounds.
- Change cages every 2 days.
For analysis:
- Blind genotypes to analyzer and analyze the size of the wound with Adobe Photoshop and normalize number of pixels per wound to Day 0.
- Assess the contribution of Rev-erb to wound healing by combining data from independent experiments and analyze using a linear mixed effects model. This was done using the R package ‘nlme’ (R script: wound model <- lme('wound size' ~ 'genotype' * 'time point', random=~1 | 'independent experiment' /'independent mouse' /'nested observation', data=data.file, na.action='na.exclude').
Copyright: Content may be subjected to copyright.
How to cite:Readers should cite both the Bio-protocol preprint and the original research article where this protocol was used:
- Eichenfield, D(2020). Wound healing studies. Bio-protocol Preprint. bio-protocol.org/prep365.
- Eichenfield, D. Z., Troutman, T. D., Link, V. M., Lam, M. T., Cho, H., Gosselin, D., Spann, N. J., Lesch, H. P., Tao, J., Muto, J., Gallo, R. L., Evans, R. M. and Glass, C. K.(2016). Tissue damage drives co-localization of NF-κB, Smad3, and Nrf2 to direct Rev-erb sensitive wound repair in mouse macrophages. eLife. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.13024
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this
article to respond.
Post a Question 0 Q&A