Continuous trait analysis

RD Rosanne C. van Deuren
PA Peer Arts
GC Giulio Cavalli
MJ Martin Jaeger
MS Marloes Steehouwer
MV Maartje van de Vorst
CG Christian Gilissen
LJ Leo A. B. Joosten
CD Charles A. Dinarello
MM Musa M. Mhlanga
VK Vinod Kumar
MN Mihai G. Netea
FV Frank L. van de Veerdonk
AH Alexander Hoischen
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

A rare variant burden analysis (RVBA) was performed on the log-transformed cytokine levels by using the Sequence Kernel Association Test (SKAT) [14, 30] in R version 3.5.2. The SKAT is a kernel-based test method that aggregates weighted individual variant-score test statistics while allowing variant-variant interactions and is extremely powerful when a genetic region has both protective and deleterious variants or many non-causal variants [14, 30, 31]. The SKAT was performed over three levels of grouping: (I) gene level, where all variants in a gene region are combined into a set (Fig. 1e.I), (II) subpathway level, where all variants in genes that belong to the corresponding subpathway are combined into a set (Fig. 1e.II), and (III) inflammatory level, where based on gene-encoded protein function genes are classified with either a pro- or anti-inflammatory phenotype and all variants from genes in either groups are combined into a set (Fig. 1e.III). All variant sets were pruned for linkage disequilibrium (LD) based on within-cohort metrics and the commonly used R2 cut-off of > 0.8, using the snpStats package in R [32]. For each region, we used the SKAT_CommonRare function with default weights to determine the effect of only common (I.SKAToC) and combined common and rare variants (II.SKATjoint), and the SKAT-O algorithm with default weights (III.SKATO) to determine the effect of only rare variants, where common and rare variant classification was based on a cohort MAF of 5% (Fig. 1f,g). The SKAT-O algorithm uses a linear combination of the SKAT and Burden Test, making it slightly more powerful than the “normal” SKAT when rare variants in a set are truly causal or influencing the phenotype in the same direction [31]. SKATO accompanying rho-values can be used to assess the contribution of SKAT versus Burden Test for significant sets, reflecting the proportion of bi- and unidirectionality of an association. In the case of rare and joint tests, output based on > 1 variant was considered, and in the case of joint tests, the presence of both rare and common variants in the set was an additional requirement. P values were Bonferroni-adjusted for each previously defined test separately, based on the number of groups tested within one level of grouping for each cytokine. For data wrangling and visualizations, we used a variety of R packages, e.g., dplyr, reshape2, ggplot2, scales, ggpubr, ggrepel, hash, ggpmisc, and devtools, all of which are freely available online [33, 34].

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A