After the last imaging examination, mice were sacrificed and perfused with 0.9% NaCl and 4% PFA. Brains were fixed in 4% PFA O/N, embedded in paraffin and cut in 10 µm coronal sections. Immunohistochemistry was performed for all animals using the paraffin embedded coronal brain sections employing antibodies for microglia (1:250, rabbit anti Iba1, 019-19741, Wako), TSPO (1:250, rabbit anti PBR, ab109497, Abcam, Cambridge UK) and GFAP (1:500, chicken anti GFAP, ab13970, Abcam, Cambridge UK). Antigen retrieval was performed by boiling the slides in citrate buffer (pH 6; 18 min). Slides were then treated with blocking solution at RT for one hour (1% BSA and 0.5% Triton-X in PBS), subsequently incubated (4 °C O/N) with the primary antibodies, followed by incubation with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:1000, A-21206, life technologies, Carlsbad, USA), or Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated anti-rabbit (1:1000, A-21432, life technologies, Carlsbad, USA). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (0.2 µg/ml in PBS, Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). Slices were embedded using Mowiol solution (6 g glycerol, 2.4 g Mowiol 4-88 (0713, Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), 6 ml distilled water, 12 ml Tris-HCl (pH8.5)). For conventional histology, slides were incubated with a biotinylated goat anti-rabbit (1:800, 45 min, B21078, Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany), followed by HRP-Streptavidin incubation (1:600, 20 min, K1016, Dako, Hamburg, Germany). The staining was visualized by incubation with 3,3 Diaminobenzidine (D-5637, Sigma, St. Louis, USA) for 5 min. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated and mounted using Entellan (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Images were acquired with a combined fluorescence-light microscope (Nikon Eclipse NI-E, Nikon, Japan). Positive cells were quantified by manually counting the number of cells present in 20× magnification images taken from biological triplicates.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.