Statistical Analyses

BC Bhishamjit S. Chera
SK Sunil Kumar
CS Colette Shen
RA Robert Amdur
RD Roi Dagan
RG Rebecca Green
EG Emily Goldman
JW Jared Weiss
JG Juneko Grilley-Olson
SP Shetal Patel
AZ Adam Zanation
TH Trevor Hackman
JB Jeff Blumberg
SP Samip Patel
BT Brian Thorp
MW Mark Weissler
WY Wendell Yarbrough
NS Nathan Sheets
WM William Mendenhall
XT Xianming M. Tan
GG Gaorav P. Gupta
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The primary objective of this study was to estimate the NPV and PPV for ctHPVDNA-based surveillance to identify patients with recurrence of HPV-associated OPSCC. We reasoned that a blood-based surveillance test would be useful if the NPV was > 90%. With a sample size of 115 patients and an estimated 2-year recurrence rate of approximately 12%,8 we anticipated that approximately 100 patients would test negative for the blood test. This sample size yielded 80% power to claim the test was useful (ie, NPV > 90%) at a 1-sided alpha level .05, if the true NPV was 97% or higher. Recurrence was defined as biopsy-proven disease that was diagnosed after the 3-month post-treatment PET/CT. Kaplan-Meier estimates of local control (LC), regional control (RC), local-regional control (LRC), distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated relative to the last day of CRT. Statistical significance was assessed using a 2-tailed log-rank test. Ninety-five percent binomial CIs were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A