Quantification and Statistical Analysis

BR Benjamin J.A. Robert
MM Maïté M. Moreau
SC Steve Dos Santos Carvalho
GB Gael Barthet
CR Claudia Racca
MB Mehdi Bhouri
AQ Anne Quiedeville
MG Maurice Garret
BA Bénédicte Atchama
AA Alice Shaam Al Abed
CG Christelle Guette
DH Deborah J. Henderson
AD Aline Desmedt
CM Christophe Mulle
AM Aline Marighetto
MM Mireille Montcouquiol
NS Nathalie Sans
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

No method of randomization to assign experimental groups was performed but they are similar to those reported in previous publications (Hilal et al., 2017, Moreau et al., 2010). Data collection and analysis were performed blind to the conditions of the experiment. All animals were assigned randomly to the different experimental conditions. Normality and homogeneity of variances from the samples were tested with Shapiro-Wilk test and Bartlett test respectively. If data were parametric, Student’s t test (two comparisons), ANOVA 1-way (multiple comparisons), ANOVA 2-way or ANOVA 3-way were used. Otherwise non-parametric tests were used (Mann-Whitney or Kruskall-Wallis). When significant interaction effects of main factors were detected, post hoc analyses, recommended by GraphPad Prism 7 software (Bonferroni’s, Sidak’s or Tukey’s for ANOVA and Dunn’s for Kruskall-Wallis), were performed. Effects with p values ≤ 0.05 are reported as significant. The exact value of n, what they represent as well as SEM or SD graphic display are indicated in figure legends. Detailed information about statistical tests used and their results are provided in an excel statistical Table (Table S1).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A