request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Different 3D-printing pattern architectures were tested to study their influence on the cross-sectional morphology and mechanical properties of the samples, according to Figure 1.

The internal architecture used for the 3D printing of the samples: (a). solid, (b). cylinder (tube), (c). standard.

The specifics of the samples were:

Plain walls with 0.5 mm thickness were printed to encase these samples;

Plain walls with 0.5 mm thickness were printed to encase these samples.

From each variant presented in Figure 1, five samples were obtained using a CreatBot DX - 3D double-nozzle printer, using 0.4 mm printing resolution and a 0.2 mm layer resolution for performing each mechanical test. The type and dimensions of the samples were adapted to the tests as follows:

Tensile test samples: total length 160 mm, calibrated length 60 mm, thickness 3 mm, radius between the calibrated section and the fastening sections 76.29 mm, fastening section length 22.5 mm and 20 mm width;

Cylindrical blocks for compression tests: diameter 10 mm, height 15 mm;

Three point-bending samples: 160 mm length, 16 mm width and 3 mm height;

Impact energy (shock resistance) cubic samples: 15 mm in edge.

In order to eliminate uncertainly values, each mechanical test was replicated five times, and the average values for the mechanical strength of the prints are presented in the paper.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A