Three classification performance measurements, i.e., accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Sn), and specificity (Sp), were used to evaluate how well a feature subset performed (Ye et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2018; Yokoi et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018). The RA children were regarded as the positive samples (P) while the matched controls were the negative samples (N). P and N were also denoted as the numbers of positive and negative samples. Sensitivity (Sn) was defined as the correctly predicted ratio of positive samples, i.e., Sn = TP/(TP + FN) = TP/P, where TP and FN were the numbers of correctly and incorrectly predicted positive samples, respectively. Specificity (Sp) was the correct prediction ratio of negative samples, i.e., Sp = TN/(TN + FP) = TN/N, where TN and FP were the numbers of negative samples with correct and incorrect predictions, respectively. The overall prediction Acc was defined as Acc = (TP + TN)/(P + N).
These measurements were used in various prediction models like the DNA and RNA functional elements (He et al., 2018; Feng et al., 2019). And they were calculated using the 10-fold cross-validation (10FCV) strategy as similar in Ye et al. (2017) and Zhao et al. (2018).
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.