To determine the drug loading content (DLC) and encapsulation efficiency (EE), the optical spectra of supernatants collected after each washing step were measured using a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer. The amount of ICG and DOX in the supernatants were determined according to the corresponding calibration curves (absorbance intensity vs. concentration) at 488 nm and 780 nm, respectively. Then, the DLC and EE for both drugs were calculated according to formulas (4) and (5), respectively.
where WFed drug is the initial amount of fed drug, WDrug in supernatant is the amount of drug in the supernatants after centrifugation, and WSMID NPs is the amount of as-synthesized SMID nanoparticles.
Drug release from SMID nanoparticles was evaluated under different pH or H2O2 conditions based on a traditional dialysis method in vitro 69. Specifically, 2 mL of SMID nanoparticle dispersion (1.5 mg·mL-1) was loaded into each dialysis bag (MWCO = 3500) and then submerged into 78 mL of 1×PBS as releasing medium under different pH conditions (pH = 7.4, 6.8 or 5.0). H2O2 concentration was set as 100 μM to reflect the condition of tumor microenvironment in the H2O2 positive groups. The setup was placed in a shaker at a constant temperature of 37 °C or 43 °C under the dark condition. To monitor the release kinetics, 3 mL of releasing medium was sampled at predesigned time points, and fresh medium of equivalent volume was supplemented to the releasing system. To analyze the photothermal response of drug release, the dialysis bag was exposed to an NIR laser (808 nm, 2 W·cm-2) for several on/off cycles (5 min of irradiation per cycle). The amount of released drug was quantified according to a calibration curve measured by florescence spectroscopy (λex: 488 nm, λem: 560 nm).
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.