Statistical analyses

CL Carine Legrand
RA Ranja Andriantsoa
PL Peter Lichter
GR Günter Raddatz
FL Frank Lyko
JF Justin C. Fay
VM Ville Mustonen
JF Justin C. Fay
VM Ville Mustonen
JF Justin C. Fay
VM Ville Mustonen
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

R [61] and Python [62] were used for all statistical analyses. Confidence intervals at 95% probability for the tree root in P. virginalis are taken as the 95% highest posterior density (HPD) interval. All statistical tests were unpaired and two-sided, with a level of significance set at 5%. Segmentation p-values correspond to the test of significant difference between segments (Davies’ test, R package segmented). To check against overfitting, k-fold cross-validation of the segmentation procedure was conducted, with k = 10 folds. The resulting difference between test and validation mean square errors (MSE) was then examined. A non-increasing difference, when including one additional phase, indicates the absence of overfitting. Correlation coefficients between SBS1 and SBS5 were determined using Pearson method, and summarized by their median and IQR over GBM samples. A comparison between groups was made using an unpaired Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Differential time to recurrence between subgroups in the manually sorted ωγN curves was assessed using a Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test between curve types "Peak", "Increase" and "Paused Start". The "Convex" curve type was excluded, because there was only 1 instance of this kind of curve, in the subset of samples with infomation on the time to recurrence. The association of the γRP ratio with the time to recurrence was assessed with a linear regression, using a simple or double log10 scale on the γRP ratio, with Bonferroni adjustment.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A