2.2. Trial overview

YG Yashdeep Gupta
DK Deksha Kapoor
JL Josyula K. Lakshmi
DP Devarsetty Praveen
JS Joseph Alvin Santos
LB Laurent Billot
AN Aliya Naheed
HS H. Asita de Silva
IG Ishita Gupta
NF Noshin Farzana
RJ Renu John
SA Saumiyah Ajanthan
NB Neerja Bhatla
AD Ankush Desai
AP Arunasalam Pathmeswaran
DP Dorairaj Prabhakaran
HT Helena Teede
SZ Sophia Zoungas
AP Anushka Patel
NT Nikhil Tandon
ask Ask a question
Favorite

In the LIVING trial, 13 we evaluated women with a recent diagnosis of GDM. We randomized 1601 women who did not have diabetes at the first postpartum visit (prerandomization) in 1:1 to lifestyle intervention vs usual care. The primary outcome was worsening of glycemia (normal to prediabetes/diabetes or prediabetes to diabetes) based on OGTT using American Diabetes Association criteria. 14 The intervention did not affect the primary outcome with no difference in glycemic status compared to usual care (25.5% vs 27.1%; hazard ratio, 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.76–1.12]; p = .42). Due to the lack of significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes, including weight, and diabetes rates, we used the dataset from both arms for the current study. In addition, we included those who underwent testing (postpartum OGTT) as part of the baseline visit but did not undergo randomization either due to the detection of diabetes or were excluded/not enrolled in the trial for other reasons.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A