ask Ask a question
Favorite

Using the TCGA-KIRC dataset as a training cohort, for the identified hub genes, we performed a univariate Cox regression survival analysis to identify prognostic CRGs, applying a significance threshold of P < 0.05. To mitigate overfitting and optimize the model performance, we conducted Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis with 10-fold cross-validation and 1000 iterations. We used the “glmnet” package (ver. 4.1-6) to perform this analysis on the identified genes. Subsequently, the CAF score was calculated by the following method (Equation 1):

According to the median CAF score, we classified the 533 ccRCC samples into two categories: low-CAF and high-CAF groups. Scatter plots elucidated the correlation between CAF scores and survival status. Both PCA and t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) were employed to evaluate the capability of the risk model to distinguish between the low-CAF and high-CAF groups. To assess the differential overall survival between the two groups, we conducted a survival analysis utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. We also plotted time-dependent Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves to gauge the model’s prognostic accuracy. For further validation, we also applied the CAF risk model to the E-MTAB-1980 dataset.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A