Frailty assessment

MH Merve Hafızoğlu
HY Hatice Kübra Yıldırım
AB Arzu Okyar Baş
DK Didem Karaduman
Zeynep Şahiner
BD Burcu Balam Doğu
MH Meltem Gülhan Halil
MC Mustafa Cankurtaran
CB Cafer Balcı
ask Ask a question
Favorite

For frailty assessment, the Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP), the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and the Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS) were performed.

The FFP is a commonly used tool for detecting physical frailty, and it includes five criteria: unintentional weight loss; weakness or poor handgrip strength; self-reported exhaustion; slow walking speed; and low physical activity. A total score of 0 means that a person is robust or not frail; 1–2 prefrail; and 3 and above means frail [2, 25]. The CFS is a judgment-based tool to screen for frailty. An individual’s frailty status is scored from 0 to 9 with the aid of a visual chart by an experienced clinician. Level 1 indicates very fit; level 2 fit; level 3 managing well; level 4 living with very mild frailty; level 5 living with mild frailty; level 6 living with moderate frailty; level 7 living with severe frailty; level 8 living with very severe frailty; and level 9 terminally ill [26, 27]. The EFS is a valid and reliable frailty detection tool consisting of 9 items (cognition, general health status, functional independence, social support, medication use, nutrition, mood, continuity, and functional performance). Total score from 0 to 5 points indicates robust; 6–7 points, apparently vulnerable; 8–9 points, mildly frail; 10–11 points, moderately frail; 12–17 points indicate severe frailty [28, 29].

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A