2.7. Phylogenetic Analysis and Divergence Time Estimation

YL Yu Liang
LX Lin Xian
JP Jinmin Pan
KZ Kecheng Zhu
HG Huayang Guo
BL Baosuo Liu
NZ Nan Zhang
YO Yan Ou-Yang
QZ Qin Zhang
DZ Dianchang Zhang
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

To determine the phylogenetic position of S. forsteni, phylogenetic analysis was conducted using single-copy homologous genes from its genome and those of thirteen teleost fishes (O. niloticus, O. latipes, L. crocea, C. rostratus, Plectropomus leopardus, Archocentrus centrarchus, Labrus bergylta, C. undulatus, Notolabrus celidotus, D. rerio, Acanthochromis polyacanthus, A. ocellaris, Stegastes partitus) and one outgroup (Homo sapiens). The genomic data for these species, obtained from NCBI, were analyzed for homologous clustering using the OrthoFinder v2.5.4 [59]. Subsequently, based on the above results, the unique genes of S. forsteni were identified, and the single-copy homologous genes of each species were aligned using MAFFT v7.490 [60] to create a super-alignment matrix. A phylogenetic tree was then constructed using RAXML v8.2.12 [61] with default settings. In this study, divergence times for 14 species were estimated using a phylogenetic tree with specific time nodes using the Mcmctree program from PAML v4.9. This involved five calibration points: the divergence between Danio rerio and Homo sapiens (approx. 423.3–440.0 Mya), D. rerio and Sparisoma partitus (approx. 180.0–251.5 Mya), S. partitus and Ambloplites centrarchus (approx. 74.4–96.5 Mya), Labrus bergylta and Cichla undulatus (approx. 51.8–63.1 Mya), and Cichla rostratus and N. celidotus (approx. 83.2–142.9 Mya) [62]. Additionally, we conducted statistical comparisons of multi-copy orthologs, unique paralogs, other orthologs, and unclustered genes in the predicted gene libraries, across the species.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A