Improve Research Reproducibility A Bio-protocol resource
Concise Method
tooltip

Learn

JR Jayamini Ranaweera
DW Dan Weaving
MZ Marco Zanin
MP Matthew C. Pickard
GR Gregory Roe
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The final phase of the cycle was used to analyze the collected data from the measure step to determine if the MVP met the usability criteria set in the plan step. In line with the measure step, two distinctive approaches were considered for the two systems.

Finally, the validity and severity (minor vs. major) of the unraveled usability problems were evaluated with the authors DW and GR. In relation to the plan step, if no major usability problems were present, it was decided to Persevere with the existing design by conducting any minor amendments. Otherwise, a new MVP was developed by Pivoting to the build step and the build-measure-learn loop were repeated.

Copyright and License information:  ©2022 Ranaweera, Weaving, Zanin, Pickard and Roe.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A