2.4.2. MEGA-PRESS data

TN Tulika Nandi
OP Oula Puonti
WC William T. Clarke
CN Caroline Nettekoven
HB Helen C. Barron
JK James Kolasinski
TH Taylor Hanayik
EH Emily L. Hinson
AB Adam Berrington
VB Velicia Bachtiar
AJ Ainslie Johnstone
AW Anderson M. Winkler
AT Axel Thielscher
HJ Heidi Johansen-Berg
CS Charlotte J. Stagg
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Pre-processing and fitting was achieved using a combined FID-A [42] and Gannet [43] pipeline. Specifically, the data were concatenated and pre-processed using FID-A (run_megaoressproc_auto script) before being zero-padded and filtered (3 Hz line broadening) to match Gannet's pre-processing. Finally, it was fitted and quantified using Gannet (GannetFit, GannetCoRegister, GannetSegment, GannetQuantify). The following criteria were applied to excluding poor quality spectra: NAA linewidth >10 Hz, and a GABA:tCr ratio of <0 or >1. MRS data quality information for included participants is provided in Supplementary Table 1. This dataset was not included in the Glx analysis due to contamination/ signal distortion from poorly phased residual water signal.

Example Semi-LASER and MEGA-PRESS model fits are shown in Supplementary Figs. 18 and 19. Small differences in the TE and TR between the sequences will potentially lead to small differences in our quantification of GABA and Glutamate. However, these would be expected to be in the order of a few percent, in the worst case [44,45], and should be accounted for by modelling participant as a random effect in our model.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A