Vapour pressures

PS Paolo A. Sossi
IS Ingo L. Stotz
SJ Seth A. Jacobson
AM Alessandro Morbidelli
HO Hugh St.C. O’Neill
ask Ask a question
Favorite

For silicate materials, vaporisation reactions can be generalised as:

where Mx+nOx+n2 is the metal oxide species in the silicate melt, MxOx2 is the stable gas species with metal oxidation state of x, balanced by n4 moles of O2 gas for a congruent reaction (i.e., in which the gas(es) produced have the same composition as the reactant(s)).

At equilibrium, the partial pressure (assuming ideal gas behaviour such that f = p), is given by:

where,

for which ΔG(r) is the Gibbs Free Energy of the vaporisation reaction, R the gas constant and Ts the equilibrium temperature set by the magma ocean at its surface in Kelvin. At low pressures in which volume changes are insignificant relative to the standard state (here taken at 1 bar),

In which ΔH is the enthalpy change and ΔS the entropy change of reaction. Substituting this equation into eq. (12), one obtains:

From experimental assessment of the equilibrium vapour pressures of metal-bearing gas species above metal oxides or metal oxide components in silicate melts, ΔS is near-constant15,70, which results in slopes in logpi vs. T space that are sub-parallel for almost all elements (Supplementary Figure 1). Element volatilities are defined by their 50% condensation (or evaporation) temperature in the solar nebular gas15:

Here, fvap = the fraction in the vapour (=0.5 for 50% condensation). The fO2 is that of a cooling solar nebula71, while the total pressure is 10-4 bar in keeping with convention19,29. The Tc50 of a given fictive element is defined by holding ΔS constant and changing the value of ΔH in eq. (16). Their properties are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

The partial pressure is determined as a function of temperature, element activity, fO2 of the atmosphere and the stoichiometry of the vaporisation reaction, n (eq. 11). This links the Tc50 of an element with its general volatility behaviour under planet-forming conditions. Because most elements evaporate according to n = 2 stoichiometries15, including all five major cation-forming elements in the BSE composition (Fe, Mg, Si, Ca, and Al), we adopt n = 2 for all fictive elements (Supplementary Table 1). Hence, relative fractionation by volatility is insensitive to fO2, which is not the case for the alkalis (n = 1), or for the Group VI metals (Cr, Mo, and W) for which n < 015. However, this simplification is apt to establish the overall trend of element depletion, and not to account for anomalies in the abundances of certain elements. Moreover, it is independent of any eventual revisions to Tc50 values.

The sum of the partial pressures dictate the total pressure at any given T and fO2:

since p(MxOx2) depends on (fO2)-n/4, congruent evaporation (eq. 11) demands that oxygen fugacity be equal to n/4 times the sum of the partial pressures of the metal oxide species. Because n = 2 in our treatment (Supplementary Table 1), then:

Thus, the value of fO2 is solved iteratively until the term 0.5PT is equal to ½ the sum of the individual partial pressures of each component at a given temperature. Here, we constrain element activities by fitting our value of PT to that calculated for evaporation of silicate mantles72. To do so, we assign an activity to each fictive element as a function of its Tc50 value. As per planetary materials, the three most abundant elements (Fe, Mg and Si) have Tc50 ~ 1300 – 1400 K. We use a Gaussian distribution to model a peak element activity about 1350 K. The rate at which element activity declines is found by minimisation to the PT determined in ref. 72 over the range 1800 < T (K) < 3000, using the objective function:

By iterating the value of c:

We obtain a best-fit value to the total pressure above the bulk silicate Earth72 (Supplementary Figure 2) at c = 100, yielding the initial activities, (xγ)initial, shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A