We share an observation emphasizing the importance and dependence of the airfoil area on the calculation of coefficients of lift and drag in our study. This is of course a simple mathematical statement, but it raises practical problems when applied to gliding animals that have relatively small wings but may use much of their body surface in gliding. During initial analyses of our dataset, we used only the area of the patagium, measured by hand using the morphometric data images, as the airfoil area. This resulted in implausibly high values for the coefficients, leading us to shift to using the planform area of the entire lizard, including head, body, patagium and proximal portions of the limbs for aerodynamic force coefficient calculations, approximately doubling the area compared to the patagium alone. Comparison between this dataset and other studies of animal gliding should keep this methodological distinction of airfoil area in mind, it strongly influences the value of CL and CD but not their ratio since in that case the area terms cancel. Furthermore, this result emphasizes the significant contribution of the mostly flat body parts of the glider, apart from the primary wing surface, towards generating aerodynamic forces as exemplified in the extreme by gliding snakes which lack any morphologically distinct wing.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.