Comparison of mtDNA sequence variations

CL Chunyu Liu
JF Jessica L. Fetterman
XS Xianbang Sun
KY Kaiyu Yan
PL Poching Liu
YL Yan Luo
JD Jun Ding
JZ Jun Zhu
DL Daniel Levy
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

We applied the 3–97% threshold to mtDNA sequences to identify homoplasmy and heteroplasmy between two DNA sources. That is, a site was identified as homoplasmy if AAF > 97% and a site was deemed as heteroplasmy if AAF was between 3 and 97%. We excluded any sites with coverage < 250-fold, and we also excluded the following artifact prone sites: 301, 302, 310, 316, 3107, 16,182, according to the guidance from the mtDNA calling pipeline by Broad Institute (gnomAD v3.1)31. We compared the distribution of homoplasmic and heteroplasmic sites between the paired samples. We also compared the distribution of AAFs for identified mtDNA variation sites between paired samples. We used MToolBox27 to identify mtDNA sequence variations from whole blood-derived DNA samples. The identification of mtDNA sequence variations in LCL-derived DNA samples was previously described11. All statistical analyses for comparisons used R language32.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A