Optical intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS)

CJ Changyou Jiang
XY Xiao Yang
GH Guanhong He
FW Fan Wang
ZW Zhilin Wang
WX Wendong Xu
YM Ying Mao
LM Lan Ma
FW Feifei Wang
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Three weeks following virus infection, mice labeled with Mor-Ens or Sal-Ens were given six daily intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) training sessions. Behavioral training and testing were performed in a mouse-operant apparatus (Med Associates) interfaced with optogenetic stimulation equipment (Newdoon Inc and Inper Tech, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China). Each operant behavior chamber was equipped with a dim-light source and a nose-poke hole equipped with infrared photobeams connected to a computer. A 1-h fixed-ratio one (FR1) schedule was performed every training day. A nose poke in the target hole produced 2 s of 473-nm light (5 ms, 20 Hz, 10 mW). For drug-infusion studies, mice received injections of either flupenthixol (0.5 mg/kg, Tocris, Bristol, UK) or saline vehicle intraperitoneally 30 min prior to ICSS sessions. For negative-reinforcement procedures [68], mice were placed into the chamber and delivered continuous 473-nm (5 ms, 20 Hz, 10 mW) optical stimulation with an interstimulus interval of 1 s. The mice were trained on a FR1 training schedule, in which each active nose poke produced a 20-s laser shut-off and the terminals were not optogenetically activated.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A