Test reagents and procedures

MA Modupe Comfort Ayoola
AO Akwoba Joseph Ogugua
VA Victor Oluwatoyin Akinseye
TJ Tunde Olu Joshua
MB Morenikeji Folusho Banuso
FA Folashade Julianah Adedoyin
HA Hezekiah Kehinde Adesokan
TO Temidayo Olutayo Omobowale
JA John Olusoji Abiola
PO Patricia Ihuaku Otuh
HN Helen Oyebukola Nottidge
ED Emma-Jane Dale
LP Lorraine Perrett
AT Andrew Taylor
JS Judy Stack
SC Simeon Idowu Babalola Cadmus
ask Ask a question
Favorite

All test reagents used in this study (RSA antigen, RBT antigen, SAT antigen, cELISA kit) were supplied by the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) (Surrey, United Kingdom) and standardized according to the stipulations set by the OIE [23]. Serum samples were examined by RSA, RBT, SAT and cELISA for antibodies to Brucella sp. The RSA test and RBT were performed as described by Amin et al. (2012) [24]. Briefly, 30µl of serum sample was mixed with equal volume of antigen on a white enamel plate. The plate was rocked and serum samples that showed agglutination were recorded as sero-positive to Brucella sp. Positive samples by RSA and RBT were further respectively analysed using SAT and cELISA as previously described [24, 25]. Data were analyzed using Stata versions 12. Frequencies were generated and Chi square test was used to explore variables potentially associated with Brucella infection among dogs. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 5%. Variables significant at 10% on bivariate analysis were entered into the logistic regression model.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A