Published: Vol 9, Iss 7, Apr 5, 2019 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3202 Views: 6975
Reviewed by: David PaulGundeep KaurAnonymous reviewer(s)
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
Triplet-primed PCR and Melting Curve Analysis for Rapid Molecular Screening of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Types 1, 2, and 3
Mulias Lian [...] Samuel S. Chong
Jun 20, 2023 649 Views
Development of a Rapid Epstein–Barr Virus Detection System Based on Recombinase Polymerase Amplification and a Lateral Flow Assay
Yidan Sun [...] Chao Shen
Dec 5, 2024 637 Views
Rapid Plasmid-Free Generation of Recombinant Positive-Strand RNA Viruses That Use IRES-Mediated Translation Using an Expansion of the Circular Polymerase Extension Reaction (CPER)
Hirotaka Yamamoto [...] Takausuke Fukuhara
Apr 20, 2025 753 Views
Abstract
Persistence of the human hepatitis B virus (HBV) requires the maintenance of covalently closed circular (ccc)DNA, the episomal genome reservoir in nuclei of infected hepatocytes. cccDNA elimination is a major aim in future curative therapies currently under development. In cell culture based in vitro studies, both hybridization- and amplification-based assays are currently used for cccDNA quantification. Southern blot, the current gold standard, is time-consuming and not practical for a large number of samples. PCR-based methods show limited specificity when excessive HBV replicative intermediates are present. We have recently developed a real-time quantitative PCR protocol, in which total cellular DNA plus all forms of viral DNA are extracted by silica column. Subsequent incubation with T5 exonuclease efficiently removes cellular DNA and all non-cccDNA forms of viral DNA while cccDNA remains intact and can reliably be quantified by PCR. This method has been used for measuring kinetics of cccDNA accumulation in several in vitro infection models and the effect of antivirals on cccDNA. It allowed detection of cccDNA in non-human cells (primary macaque and swine hepatocytes, etc.) reconstituted with the HBV receptor, human sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP). Here we present a detailed protocol of this method, including a work flowchart, schematic diagram and illustrations on how to calculate “cccDNA copies per (infected) cell”.
Keywords: Hepatitis B VirusBackground
The Hepatitis B virus (HBV), a DNA virus belonging to the family Hepadnaviridae, is a human pathogen persisting in approximately 240 million people globally. HBV infection leads to higher risks of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (Liang et al., 2015). At present, chronic HBV infection is not curable as current treatments do not eradicate the replicative reservoir, covalently closed circular (ccc)DNA (Levrero et al., 2016). In in vitro infected hepatocytes, cccDNA is formed by cellular repair of relaxed circular duplex (rc)DNA, the genomic form in virions (Guo et al., 2007; Long et al., 2017; Schreiner and Nassal, 2017). cccDNA serves as the viral template for pregenomic RNA which becomes encapsidated into nucleocapsids and is reverse transcribed to generate rcDNA and double-stranded linear (dsl)DNA by the viral polymerase (Bartenschlager and Schaller, 1992; Tu et al., 2017). Of note, albeit the reconstitution of hepatoma cells with the receptor human sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP), high excess of inoculated virions with high multiple genome equivalents (mges) (mges > 100) is required to achieve moderate infection rates (e.g., > 20% in HepG2NTCP cells) (Qu et al., 2018). This raises the problem that cccDNA-containing samples taken early after inoculation with HBV contain large amounts of rcDNA from input virions.
Therefore, adequate methodologies for absolute or relative quantification of cccDNA are required. They are divided into two categories: (I) hybridization after separation by gel electrophoresis (Southern blot) and (II) PCR amplification (Li et al., 2017). Southern blot is still a gold standard but not very sensitive, and demands multiple experimental processes and a high-copy load of cccDNA (> 2 x 106 copies using 32P-radioactive isotope/digoxigenin/biotin probe; > 1 x 104 copies using branched DNA technique) (Yu et al., 2015). Therefore, hybridization-based methods are complicated, time-consuming and not practical for a large number of samples (e.g., > 20) to be analyzed in parallel. PCR methods include real-time quantitative (q)PCR, nested qPCR (Xu et al., 2011), digital-droplet PCR (Mu et al., 2015), and rolling circle amplification (Margeridon et al., 2008). Real-time qPCR is the fastest and the most robust method for almost all laboratories. However, unlike Southern blot which gel electrophoretically separates cccDNA, PCR methods are not strictly specific, especially when rcDNA and other HBV replicative intermediates are present in excess, such as in in vitro infection (e.g., MGE > 300), even when cccDNA-specific primer pairs are used (Nassal, 2015; Qu et al., 2018).
To solve this problem, we have developed a qPCR assay using validated cccDNA selective primer pairs and a digestion step by T5 exonuclease, which removes cellular DNA and all HBV intermediates via its exonuclease activity targeting free ends of rcDNA and dslDNA but leaves cccDNA intact (Qu et al., 2018). This assay allowed fast and specific quantification of cccDNA within one working day as shown in Figure 1 (2 h of total DNA extraction; 1.5 h of T5 exonuclease reaction and 2 h of qPCR), accurate calculation of “cccDNA copies/(infected) cell” (Figure 2) and drug efficacy testing on cccDNA levels (Figure 3). The method also provided quantitative judgment on whether cccDNA is formed in new cell models and identified low amount of cccDNA in in vitro infection of non-primate hepatocytes (Lempp et al., 2016 and 2017). This protocol is adapted from Qu et al. (2018) and herein more detailed information on this qPCR quantification after T5 exonuclease digestion is included, and different primer pairs are compared to address the applicability of HBV genotypes. Taken together, this protocol will facilitate studies on cccDNA and help clinicians, technicians and graduate students to analyze cccDNA in samples derived from in vitro infection.
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Software
Procedure
Figure 1. Working flowchart of this protocol. Susceptible cells (PHH, HepaRGNTCP, HepG2NTCP) infected with high mges (> 300) of HBV are lysed. A. Lysates are incubated at 70 °C in the presence of proteinase K and later loaded on silica column and eluted. B. T5 exonuclease (5 units/1 h) removes host genomic DNA (black) and HBV replicative intermediates (rcDNA, dslDNA, etc.) (green) and preserves cccDNA (red) intact. C. cccDNA is amplified by p1040/p1996 and detected by probe p1085.
Note: Do not exceed unit and incubation time of T5 exonuclease since overdigestion leads to partial loss of cccDNA.
Data analysis
cccDNA copy number per cell or infected cell is calculated according to Figure 2. The cccDNA level in in vitro infected cells can be determined similarly as two examples shown in Figure 3 and Qu et al., 2018. Note that to discriminate signals from the inoculum, we highly recommend using an entry inhibitor (e.g., Myrcludex B) as a control. Routinely Myrcludex B control gives a value below 0.05 copy per infected cell.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the calculation of absolute cccDNA copy numbers. A. On the day of experiment, cell number in the well is determined. B. Total DNA samples are extracted as suggested in Procedure. C. Here shows a proper T5 exonuclease digestion as shown in Procedure. D. Absolute cccDNA copies and E level of human β-globin are quantified, respectively as shown in Procedure. “cccDNA copies/cell” is “cccDNA copies/well” divided by “cell numbers”. Optional: F. If calculation of copies per infected cell is required, additional wells have to be arranged in parallel on the same plate during the infection. On the day of DNA extraction, cells in the wells are fixed and subjected to an immunofluorescence assay (HBcAg visualization using DAKO B0586 antibody, etc.) to determine infectivity (%: number of HBcAg positive cells divided by number of total cells) (Qu et al., 2018). “cccDNA copies/infected cell” is the “cccDNA copies/cell” divided by “infectivity (%)”.
Figure 3. cccDNA levels in three in vitro. models and upon IFN-α-2a and Myrcludex B treatment. A. PHH, differentiated HepaRGNTCP and HepG2NTCP cells were infected with HBV at mges/cell of 500. Myrcludex B (1 μM), an entry inhibitor blocking cccDNA formation, was co-administered with HBV inoculum during infection. On Day 7 post infection, cccDNA copies per infected cell were determined. Data shown in triangles were collected from three independent experiments. B. HepG2NTCP cells were infected with HBV at mges/cell of 500 with mock treatment (untreated), co-treated with Myrcludex B (1 μM) during infection, or co- and post-treated with IFN-α-2A at 100 ng/ml purchased from PeproTech and PBL Assay Science. On Day 7 post infection, cccDNA copies per infected cell were analyzed. Statistics: P < 0.01 untreated versus IFN-treated; P = 0.828 PeproTech versus PBL.
Notes
The primer pair (pp1040-1996) is specific for the formed cccDNA in genotype D. Genotype D is the HBV genome in HepAD38 cell line. Users should consider this issue if they try patient-derived serum to perform in vitro infection using this protocol since HBV in patients can be any genotype and pp1040-1996 does not bind the formed cccDNA of other genotypes.
Genbank accession numbers of other genotypes: A (HE974370.1); B (AB540582.1); C (AB540584.1); E (HE974384.1); F (HE974369.1); G (AP007264.1); H (AB846650.1). pp1578-1867 and pp1583-2301 (Qu et al., 2018) allowing quantification of eight HBV genotypes (A-H) are suggested below. (Table 1)
Table 1. List of primer mismatches to HBV genotypes. The numbers of base-pair mismatch of each forward and reverse primers to eight HBV genotypes are summarized below. Green squares: perfect binding; yellow squares: one base-pair mismatch still allowing template binding; red squares: not binding.
F: forward primer; R: reverse primer. #: The probe of this protocol is not pan-genotypic and has mismatch number as shown: A(1), B(2), C(0), D(0), E(0), F(6), G(1), H(4).
Recipes
Acknowledgments
This protocol was adapted from Qu et al., 2018. We herein acknowledge financial supports by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)–Project number 272983813–SFB/TRR179 (B.Q. and S.U.) and German Center for Infection Research (DZIF) TTU Hepatitis projects 05.704 (S.U.). We thank Pascal Mutz (DKFZ, Germany) and Florian WR Vondran (MHH, Germany) for providing PHH. We are grateful to Xue Li for critical reading of this manuscript.
Competing interests
Prof. Dr. Stephan Urban, the corresponding author, holds patents and intellectual property on Myrcludex B.
Ethics
Following written informed consent of the patients, PHH were isolated from liver specimens obtained after partial hepatectomy.
References
Article Information
Copyright
© 2019 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Qu, B. and Urban, S. (2019). Quantification of Hepatitis B Virus Covalently Closed Circular DNA in Infected Cell Culture Models by Quantitative PCR. Bio-protocol 9(7): e3202. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3202.
Category
Microbiology > Microbial genetics > Gene expression
Microbiology > Microbial biochemistry > DNA
Molecular Biology > DNA > PCR
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link